From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF77138E66 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BB59E0B37; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D07E0B1F for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 853CC33F697 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id z12so4957884wgg.5 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:17:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=rmJUZK766a1ML9cj1IYbDGkov/3mDkliphzhUQ4FjN0=; b=HIPzh+//uvpe7r9smJS2Y45hFfIs+5uv4kpIK0LoJT+11uifrYjHrrhj5oAt17bN0k AgH8z5K9XqIpkZLkQgTXOTX7PNUKIsfBsMmSbD1SDr4ewF+/JHETqIjlZ9bHLi8waf2R w3pt8ymEvZTm6z9sEx7309nS4ZsAVnKp5CvuKtHGbo+nK0AhDeER4f8KCm/NclXyb11L LfgVxUjSFeN/n0K3idC3EnlLzxJc7zszsPLcu/+FNBOu7tvcbeAWZV2HgofhvHO/5z4C kyguj2U1Cnq6AnESq8hjoGlkygjJdXsKyhcr150bK+SzAQ6JOEL48HV4T/FT5hLyw9eO WSCA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.87.5 with SMTP id t5mr20125138wjz.68.1393262236284; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:17:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.162.229 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:17:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <530B76A6.2090008@gentoo.org> References: <530AD951.9020109@gentoo.org> <530B41DE.1050708@whissi.de> <530B76A6.2090008@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:17:16 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade From: Mike Gilbert To: Gentoo Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 796e8950-4632-473b-a376-92f0c1200cff X-Archives-Hash: 993690e196fa9829014f0113ab6f5626 On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 24/02/14 10:55 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D. >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't >>> have "/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK). >>> >>> The current news item draft raises question like "When the >>> 'actual configuration' is in >>> /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link... what will happen to >>> people without systemd (and a INSTALL_MASK set)?" >>> >>> Would be nice if the news item and Wiki could handle upgrade path >>> for systemd *and* non-systemd users... >>> >> >> You need to remove /lib/systemd/ from INSTALL_MASK. If you don't >> want unit files, mask /lib/systemd/system/ instead. >> > > ..it'd be worth adding this little tidbit to the news item, probably... > Yeah. I poked around on the wiki a bit to try and find any reference to INSTALL_MASK and systemd, but didn't find anything.