From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D20C13827E for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9851AE0B87; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9DF6E09F7 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com (mail-ie0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC04C33F269 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id tp5so11768809ieb.22 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:03:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=mGxkn3CJ/JPBsZ9GSv3ihJJXsZi74w/9gnnwn8QPFMs=; b=k8E+2cydWk0WRQHiT7fOfxeKCtacueDmKxNd0dq4avAZAmO4RLfMiJlNG/WFaV36cP +rWD0QMkFYqNx0IEp3MUgk9/qjj3mvUk6AncbwbbynV4VY3p3RMKXh5k3PwkGCkPFc79 gxx/sUxoYVbnIlzx/x8NM3Hnu3JLB94tnCzizTGWh5rGnObmeG/fG4uHrytm0rNMb/x9 sgMETJFllamWjx5gS5VrC2yu2cmYSkabqBPWV7NFYbB4cilzAFVz/k0940TMyurTQgS3 G9WNsubDxBrc4REGKGt6iOgioLb7+gFjQNxshKQ62g30HnvDkVd1eFK6jrIHyTTxhWln Eipw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.21.6 with SMTP id r6mr26565932ige.44.1386792214536; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:03:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.139.5 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:03:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52A8BC3F.3020905@gentoo.org> References: <1386708905.1931.2.camel@belkin5> <0afb01cef617$3d667a90$b8336fb0$@acm.org> <52A8BC3F.3020905@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:03:34 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? From: Mike Gilbert To: Gentoo Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: db70e4a5-0aec-423d-b75d-5ef93b7a37f4 X-Archives-Hash: c17d4a6c5635172530697fe56f3e7753 On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 12/10/2013 09:18 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote: >> >> I'd say go one step further and get rid of vixie-cron completely, is >> there anything it does that cronie can't do as well or better? > > Is cronie a drop-in replacement, or do I have to do some thinking when > replacing vixie-cron? > It should be a drop-in. The only change to make would be to remove vixie-cron and add cronie to the default runlevel.