From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-82572-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D99021396D9
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon,  6 Nov 2017 19:26:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12B3FE0D35;
	Mon,  6 Nov 2017 19:26:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B900DE0CAB
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  6 Nov 2017 19:26:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: floppym)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3038533D3C7
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  6 Nov 2017 19:26:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id r68so10418312wmr.0
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 11:26:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6LVZypcpdfAbpHmqfgVNRVKqdC2okNaLDAnAOlGbinXMvyWMCz
	vLtN3J/oTWIAZdYeUqDHbmNWNkUgm6w/tlECVio=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Rl+jjPQsMu/lGQRV7TRmUhY72VVkUKcHXUvGcNZJhR4SDCQmlhrxw/5rWfNdyAnYyct6PitFqVmLROcdDJDCg=
X-Received: by 10.28.66.144 with SMTP id k16mr6285129wmi.35.1509996380462;
 Mon, 06 Nov 2017 11:26:20 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.136.9 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 11:25:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <robbat2-20171106T191157-441414528Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
References: <1508440120.19870.14.camel@gentoo.org> <1509987501.1382.11.camel@gentoo.org>
 <robbat2-20171106T191157-441414528Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 14:25:59 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAJ0EP41R1gMoYojE0is9_1zEuV6k9Rm1s9YwEnU=_gBwSfpSSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP41R1gMoYojE0is9_1zEuV6k9Rm1s9YwEnU=_gBwSfpSSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest2 hashes, take n+1-th
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 61bf4393-5571-44ea-a324-f80845c40fb7
X-Archives-Hash: 78b7b11d25d8f226f69925e85c932945

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote=
:
> +1 overall, just one timeline clarification.
>
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:58:21PM +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:
>> T + 7 days
>> ----------
>> Set:
>>   manifest-hashes =3D BLAKE2B SHA512
>>   manifest-required-hashes =3D SHA512
>>
>> New Manifest entries will use the new hashes but Portage will keep the
>> old hash set whenever it would need to refetch old distfiles.
> Query:
> Do we need to wait for it to be stable before making this change?
> Shouldn't old stable versions of Portage continue to verify SHA512 fine?
> Mostly I think devs need to be using a new enough Portage that can
> generate the BLAKE2B entries, but it shouldn't impact user Portage
> versions.

Quite a few devs use stable versions of Portage and Repoman when committing=
.