From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-65042-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEBA138E66
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:55:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26924E0BFA;
Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:55:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30C79E0B98
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:55:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: floppym)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33B6A33EEAE
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:55:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id l18so4864440wgh.12
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:55:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=kNqPWheNptPHvXq8DU2LCeMGZXMrkx/KH4oPgbsZ9jg=;
b=PR/OK1RRzH9Wy6yk3Y5WElagF1NUn1575/JJ4oPKjXYY44vvPtgvBQMS8wCPBkEELV
YcGHryx1XH7PW8loZwHNt/yHJq/7gE9DDV//Lmg9RwVAVgULz2uU6V8pNE+egluMUt7m
bqnPDt+00bGBocmUpN9NkL65pVIKxflljHjYXUc6yESAnlo3C73B6xxKmgUfHs2elNTO
tX0zZK2CwPHe6br/1dSsA3UGvEw0kKb/HGeO3h6y3cDDdFc1xrxEpO7N6vH3QAkiXTl3
IfGSQ7RNhBqbazJ5R9NRKgP/21zAkHn2OjEnNJn5dTaOKb1yexvFZ+CsH/cD9x4Lf0u0
j/SA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.87.5 with SMTP id t5mr19721441wjz.68.1393257317676; Mon,
24 Feb 2014 07:55:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.162.229 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:55:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <530B41DE.1050708@whissi.de>
References: <530AD951.9020109@gentoo.org>
<530B41DE.1050708@whissi.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:55:17 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP41O5e9bp-ubjq_fRP7frVmLm+hUvPDrvYj05n1Ht2FYgw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: eb5e480d-284c-4a45-8c20-f36f743320c4
X-Archives-Hash: 8d16fb88ef5a9887b0a6a85cba2ef587
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D. <whissi@whissi.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't have
> "/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK).
>
> The current news item draft raises question like "When the 'actual
> configuration' is in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link... what will
> happen to people without systemd (and a INSTALL_MASK set)?"
>
> Would be nice if the news item and Wiki could handle upgrade path for
> systemd *and* non-systemd users...
>
You need to remove /lib/systemd/ from INSTALL_MASK. If you don't want
unit files, mask /lib/systemd/system/ instead.