From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-96031-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF76F158086
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:49:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADA712BC004;
	Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:49:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36821E07AE
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:49:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qk1-f176.google.com with SMTP id d2so8019649qki.12
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:49:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ODqZtVWU7FUyJrntzaT9dyxAopaCVy+FzJsqS04TnzqrpU5Gc
	/SEcDDE0RUMTc9IHL+aJ2PibzTBrt98R/UPI160=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbDD5dmDlb6Jo8fjxO48U58P/3Op89DWuqBNcx5qMo1FWhpzGCZXVorlcyxjihqpmxQtoBtHfgvisrdYIxDQs=
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:809:: with SMTP id x9mr2890539ybp.181.1637812189980;
 Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:49:49 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211125032133.6916-1-whissi@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20211125032133.6916-1-whissi@gentoo.org>
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 22:49:39 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAJ0EP41C8OHMw9AxgCPQ4M6O3-aGYtDfy3J5ckTrwY7Ov0da3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP41C8OHMw9AxgCPQ4M6O3-aGYtDfy3J5ckTrwY7Ov0da3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required:
 add item
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc: Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@gentoo.org>, PR team <pr@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Archives-Salt: 84b00d38-e9ef-4e75-a66f-daae2ccccdd9
X-Archives-Hash: 29645ceea72cb65fd5e77370e913ade5

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:21 PM Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@gentoo.org> wrote:
> +On 2021-11-21, a member of the QA project accidentially de-keyworded
> +MariaDB 10.6 to address a file collision, users, who also had latest
> +dev-db/mariadb-connector-c installed, experienced (NOTE: The default
> +MySQL connector in Gentoo Linux is provided by
> +dev-db/mysql-connector-c) [Link 1].

This sentence is very difficult to read. Also, I don't think it is
relevant to call out the mistake by the QA team in a news item
intended for end users. I would rewrite this as:

On 2021-11-21, keywords for dev-db/mariadb-10.6 were removed to
address a file collision with dev-db/mariadb-connector-c. This
unintentionally triggered a version downgrade for users who had
successfully upgraded to dev-db/mariadb-10.6 already.

> +However, downgrades are not supported in MySQL/MariaDB [Link 2].
> +
> +In case you already fully upgraded to MariaDB 10.6 (which includes
> +executing mysql_upgrade command) and forcefully downgraded your
> +MariaDB instance afterwards during the time window when keywords were
> +removed, you maybe experiencing different problems:
> +
> +At best, your forcefully downgraded MariaDB instance prevented startup
> +so all you have to do is upgrade to MariaDB 10.6 again to resume
> +services.

I don't like the phrase "forcefully downgraded" here. This implies
that something happened without the user's consent. emerge would have
informed them of the downgrade before it happened. I would suggest
removing the word "forcefully" from these paragraphs.