From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-54011-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D4E1381F4
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:07:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A5F621C03E
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:07:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0450AE06AF
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:56:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: floppym)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 444451B400E
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:56:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so3016907wgb.10
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.134.97 with SMTP id r75mr7382205wei.127.1344894974524;
 Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.2.131 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1344882542.23246.3.camel@rook>
References: <5029318A.3050706@gentoo.org>
	<502943F0.3050401@flameeyes.eu>
	<1344882542.23246.3.camel@rook>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:56:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP41=ttN0c_OEzfAsyiSrGYfNF1G_rME=yCfqwsk+Qw82Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: multilib-strict no longer in FEATURES of
 targets/developer/make.defaults (pending on bug 424423)
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 65bb567f-328d-4088-916c-253eee2cda90
X-Archives-Hash: 8458d36b2c6207e2f31f7a2e40259a4a

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev
<tetromino@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 11:14 -0700, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote:
>> Beside the fact that these would probably have looked better in
>> /usr/libexec
>
> See Kay Sievers's comment at
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D51617 :
>
> "/usr/lib/<pkgname>/ is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or even /bin. It
> shares absolutely zero things with the arch-specific $libdir ,or lib64/.
>
> /usr/lib/<pkgname>/ is the canonical "application private directory". It
> has the multi-lib or arch-specific rules as /bin.
>

So... where should GRUB2 be installing its modules? Currently they get
installed in /usr/$(get_libdir)/grub/$cpu-$platform, where cpu and
platform are determined by use flags.

Should we drop the get_libdir and put them in /usr/lib/grub instead?
Should I even worry about it?