From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-72720-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC94D13888F
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:51:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB0D721C06D;
	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:51:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06A22E080A
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:51:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: floppym)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4B1C340854
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:51:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igbkq10 with SMTP id kq10so1525121igb.0
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.28.18 with SMTP id x18mr440913igg.81.1444935059572; Thu,
 15 Oct 2015 11:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.6.193 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_=gEYf2MEDaPTiRVB4dGC52BF=ieDNA=yQJW9J7fGL_Og@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20151015034807.GK4446@vapier.lan> <20151015085745.GA46083@skade.schwarzvogel.de>
 <20151015105628.GA18915@meriadoc> <CAGfcS_moTBw+Aa-m1T+WTbHm3=tPWPKc49_g8HO9BCA2EpniXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <561F9043.2010700@gentoo.org> <20151015114759.GA25639@meriadoc>
 <20151015145801.6c4a3dc5@laptop.puleglot.ru> <CAGfcS_=gEYf2MEDaPTiRVB4dGC52BF=ieDNA=yQJW9J7fGL_Og@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:50:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP40zbtFVYCWRFFxGCsF6jmKh9MDcrn3pQJv_BJ3AoALEhg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] enable USE=xattr by default
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: e2d3a0cb-9980-412b-9b33-4aa9f983cf4e
X-Archives-Hash: d5e1e829212e7614985176d581a785cd

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Alexander Tsoy <alexander@tsoy.me> wrote:
>>
>> I was wrong. This patch was not merged upstream. It is still needed and
>> included in latest genpatches for 4.2:
>>
>> $ tar tf genpatches-4.2-6.base.tar.xz | grep XATTR
>> ./1500_XATTR_USER_PREFIX.patch
>
> I suspect what we all have in common then is that we're using tmpfs to
> do builds and we're not using genpatches.
>
> If the warning isn't an issue for non-hardened users then I don't see
> any need to change anything.  Is the patch (or something similar)
> likely to get merged?  It doesn't really seem ideal to be dependent on
> something not in mainline.

Indeed. I would suggest we at least disable XT PaX markings in the
base profile until this gets merged in the mainline kernel.