From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-49928-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1S1B0j-0005wV-Pn
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 06:21:37 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59CD5E0CEC;
Sat, 25 Feb 2012 06:21:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272A4E0C31
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 06:20:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: floppym)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F28C1B4001
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 06:20:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dady25 with SMTP id y25so3917236dad.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:20:57 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of floppym@gentoo.org designates 10.68.220.7 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.220.7;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of floppym@gentoo.org designates 10.68.220.7 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=floppym@gentoo.org
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.220.7])
by 10.68.220.7 with SMTP id ps7mr15669230pbc.160.1330150857220 (num_hops = 1);
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:20:57 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.220.7 with SMTP id ps7mr12960483pbc.160.1330150857210; Fri,
24 Feb 2012 22:20:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.46.135 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:20:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20120225060107.GA12218@linux1>
References: <20120225060107.GA12218@linux1>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:20:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP40ajViVrrdg1jzPeTfVQNgv6iemciWN7W1bmAzCymdNmw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/modutils and module-init-tools
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: dabb1db6-f4ab-49c0-b547-3e99cc1cca18
X-Archives-Hash: f2b8c5624088bdafe6b593c729ebebdc
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 1:01 AM, William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote:
> If not, once the dependencies are correct, I propose
> dropping virtual/modutils from the system set.
If we drop it from the system set, the kernel modules section of the
handbook should be updated.