From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935721381F3 for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 19:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FD84E0BFD; Sat, 25 May 2013 19:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 678E4E0BDD for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 19:58:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F65333E0C3 for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 19:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 16so15259757iea.17 for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 12:58:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=AbtJQtfBl1qeWMiQwkS3fQgg2V40Kceh3XG1XQ2mv7Q=; b=oKwshUgXKaCfNG/tZE+Ty8LunhVxyoPxjsHPpJURBvACjTe4J55DUUBnfuFz6xZ1z0 8l6zJ5Q+S+R8mInmFyroQpWD3hkHpLLcBjM+QqZQ7UMJKmwjoUY5P6kfEKzC3oSmet7G Wd61teVSSC5A6DbgsjUyfeqGgZPDfBffjzm7l2U5CDDk4wuRO4sAh6hQnZWLzy8udxcs 6jaysvElZcS8/P5yHp2RqjtlwULajMioFECas6gunPvsYSf9QKmTjJWHuaEmLf/t2mfP kAcFX4Fi0C04ShNk7cCkWx1tJ3iMvmryWuve4XkGpdn53XOvGcMrdTnBCEcDigAeyYXW Fw5A== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.31.69 with SMTP id y5mr1369263icc.44.1369511916000; Sat, 25 May 2013 12:58:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.165.167 with HTTP; Sat, 25 May 2013 12:58:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51A116B1.8010902@gentoo.org> References: <51A0FF5E.5070304@gentoo.org> <51A116B1.8010902@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 15:58:35 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697) From: Mike Gilbert To: Gentoo Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: c1c6fe35-dd15-4cb9-9440-fe09ad20f28b X-Archives-Hash: 2141cec933a395229e61099c20b2c65c On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting out? I > can't support this initiative without such a solution and I would be happy > to work with the systemd people to reach it, ie I'll test. > What about INSTALL_MASK does not work? I put the responsibility for designing a more idiot-proof opt-out system in the hands of those that actually care about it. Most of us are on systems with plenty of storage, and those who are not (embedded devs) should be perfectly capable of setting INSTALL_MASK without hosing their systems.