From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-94744-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9F57139335
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 19:31:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3CFBE0848;
Tue, 29 Jun 2021 19:31:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DA52E0837
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 19:31:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb1-f177.google.com with SMTP id s129so785817ybf.3
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qpWSHnLZCSH6/Gh+F2gvEj6shXCJdgSDCs6VooSRUc+G6XbAG
P/AqKnU4EkpqXeQDuQHshN9743YTKwmzJIwGPe0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzp5Pp2vN2s7D8KpeNkzfrTDezIEgaCvrKi2z2SJVNvWSZu8di6+c9MsPNmRhwKgqUN2JdyjI+bZ/0d8jn9MvI=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:45c3:: with SMTP id s186mr20890380yba.124.1624995098701;
Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210616093421.73766-1-marecki@gentoo.org> <YNtsuJRJwDQvl0Ff@linux1.home>
In-Reply-To: <YNtsuJRJwDQvl0Ff@linux1.home>
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:31:28 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAJ0EP40+=B_mqxngTvi93NcY79HeRu0Re_qBH5GsxDs7MRZE1g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP40+=B_mqxngTvi93NcY79HeRu0Re_qBH5GsxDs7MRZE1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lua eclasses: support EAPI 8
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Archives-Salt: 9f73513b-784f-41a2-8fb9-927630942938
X-Archives-Hash: 0e95c50d917b6af87019339609c62978
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 2:55 PM William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:34:18AM +0100, Marek Szuba wrote:
> > Nothing special here. RESTRICT manipulation in lua-utils still uses +=
> > on purpose, for consistency with how other variables are handled there
> > as well as in order to avoid wasting CPU cycles on an EAPI version
> > check for something that ultimately achieves the same.
>
> I was on vacation for a number of days so didn't have a chance to check
> on this.
>
> Is portage stable already supporting eapi 8? if so when did that happen?
> If not we can't support it in eclasses yet.
That's not true at all. You can't stabilize ebuilds with EAPI=8, but
there is no reason to hold off on merging eclass changes.