From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SAitv-00050F-Lg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:22:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92744E082D; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4557E07F0 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbz13 with SMTP id z13so2061057ghb.40 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 07:21:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dee.su; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3Eo1uo1HizVTJ32AaYWK+um2AuzktrULQ5e5pTtChYY=; b=S9uKl6nVedk7kNNBo+3zElxYZF5GXO8wrSmevIg+Pn8whZvlP/9Q8YqiT7g9MWYH0o 9EJU/pURKGav2zPFsoifD0VmmCt5DTuElL/HeVU/AZ8rd+74hw/S5XlTWyz61KcbbcU9 g/M5Squt07ZH2ZlGLqZun9AAwiY99RIIRaHxE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=3Eo1uo1HizVTJ32AaYWK+um2AuzktrULQ5e5pTtChYY=; b=gNIQo8xlETKSsimeCB3D+BRx1tQzow6dGCMNGru31LMOjSF4Xqs/9AGtEDy78DAY0l bbA/txM4QtpxltqAYFL44eVpERsDlixhvy3qO2rdH+3ZvrUY3XjIi0dfJWdG5gl6P+Yg BIOQfvySGArruR0E5dByle3+uMq859W6/cG4xWtyCRDsZhgSB/eG42G23rYRiGTjDuH6 GIqzeOHbDXLc9EVmGnQ+kxjHxe3R6yNw0nwMF4/4n96dm24ZXfafJDw6cqeJ3oYCzReg oVT/0uaczGn8bAWeE0VRqB/xxcuY9d9nuOHMTV/cYusewkx7XaJ5c1ZyWzwvPx1AHOqs d4dQ== Received: by 10.60.1.230 with SMTP id 6mr9849930oep.42.1332426061870; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 07:21:01 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.90.42 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 07:20:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120322134818.GN2372@ctf.aoz.ath.cx> References: <20120322134818.GN2372@ctf.aoz.ath.cx> From: Maxim Kammerer Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:20:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Arbitrary breakage: sys-fs/cryptsetup To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnfa6crkuB4jqGlOnnuwyXMcNhro2qd+DFbBaoeC4ssYvidE22nUmuSz220XFmtbpkqvS+4 X-Archives-Salt: fb112f37-06c3-41f9-92ca-0db5ac6eca8d X-Archives-Hash: 5e02ebe3505036bf767a515c378b7d78 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 15:48, wrote: > Please - if you're going to significantly change functionality that > (whether correct or not) people have come to depend on, have the decency > to at least publish a news article on it. Previous stable cryptsetup had an "if use dynamic" warning in pkg_setup(), which was removed instead of being converted to "if ! use static" in the new stable. No idea if that was intentional. --=20 Maxim Kammerer Libert=E9 Linux (discussion / support: http://dee.su/liberte-contribute)