From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S7t4O-00069f-Ty for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:37:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2D83E0A41; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1948E09A8 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhjj72 with SMTP id j72so2656345yhj.40 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:36:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dee.su; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RDQ7DauT6KK/rU0NNPp7luq95ysBF148sYGXkvpl2BE=; b=N9dLGyWxwD2xwKt41b1Aww7DTz5NKVVRGh9grdtTJW0bnKuv/QNKRfi14FQsGdv5sg cAfDrVaVeJnGyu+QqRamUahrGH7f3v9IGiuD4xJaAzWGiS+qqq/2uKfDGrJuFQtgUJJc 6BmJIfuW4T8xaBYa6YbFoX3lzHITbBqZTz+0s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=RDQ7DauT6KK/rU0NNPp7luq95ysBF148sYGXkvpl2BE=; b=Ui6ABPylYRay+GBOXM+yyjADt0nD1VYWA5wn/LcqXTEaof2KCPuy1LH8dGZXWueRYy Nt0dmBqKhoIts2DwkIMDZbbtsr/76m8fNFTOdepMR22n4iwS1KKtF9eA41Q6NHOLZkr6 E/l6lCX4d1KDKteISpKL+i27sEEBRICMLWaonNr2qWOaKTZKaI4N9P0iDSZqgFZ0RS/E ElmjMUsoAaM1wJ0Pa13GWJkKABqdSeJBYw6QCJuC1ZtcApc0xBRmbIUkg32UQ9pY3rgc Ft0RzITbP+/OHi5Xk3TicVC+YVIJvvTwYaYJDXb9PPNgBHnK22w8E3EWmfQf/IcHxGMr Bh7A== Received: by 10.182.169.4 with SMTP id aa4mr4630031obc.62.1331750187859; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.90.42 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:36:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120311173355.GB6599@linux1> <4F5EA152.80604@gentoo.org> <4F5FE34A.4030609@gentoo.org> <4F6091CE.1050009@gentoo.org> <20120314144115.GA30606@kroah.com> <20120314145144.GC3200@ca.inter.net> <20120314150431.GA2033@kroah.com> <20120314150827.53dc8336@googlemail.com> <20120314152209.GA2157@kroah.com> <4F60D585.4050206@gentoo.org> From: Maxim Kammerer Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:36:07 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlDzuliOwVgIE4+DRX4vmCJwC5sDzLfvvYh/kzjdVzTuyjdXR1vDSqzznxXjRD6mNXW/Em6 X-Archives-Salt: 79d524e5-62b5-4aba-a4e6-1d37533c5c4c X-Archives-Hash: 34c5fef08f1136ad67cbec95fa3582e4 On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 19:58, Matthew Summers wrote: > __Everyone__ is already using an initramfs, therefore there are no > initramfs-less systems anymore (it may just be empty). I suggest that you take a look at CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD. > Why is an in-kernel initramfs so bad anyway? I am baffled. Its quite > nice to have a minimal recovery env in case mounting fails, etc, etc, > etc. There is nothing bad about initramfs. I think that you are misreading the arguments above. --=20 Maxim Kammerer Libert=E9 Linux (discussion / support: http://dee.su/liberte-contribute)