From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SpqS2-0002o3-Dv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 00:43:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56AC2E074B; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 00:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A3DE0720 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 00:41:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl3 with SMTP id l3so4550886yen.40 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:41:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dee.su; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9CJcdvlP/W+8C7PLKgzpSLAxFz8zGl4mAJrv/icNk0Y=; b=YD99Nx1jF32rP6Yp109c+xkvpaekSsysGHJdnnY1mGFRGBq0fdgzvZtCx1TOtI34S3 ZIr+Um8IpymEaeEc396WHCt6ZClmS15muVb4++hsYN/LyKJZPlglRR0zixJFpOkKiVMq fK5LiUKTaA33gt86nG6cYf4UiPi7I/ttf1C5o= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=9CJcdvlP/W+8C7PLKgzpSLAxFz8zGl4mAJrv/icNk0Y=; b=BH7odQngUjazvDAtqVHoDeWJbFAAZrZ2Ep/IMsaEG2X9fRCfyRilt5nD67oN8hDh5S cLcjElinHW3RsakBNtMNcAIlWnKbT2VNloEORbTWyaT7clctgWZaKpoEA3HOwztGYp1I vlhEbEosNw1zdnDWOxAFOmSNSoIx+A1KGttswqxr5Sl4GCDOqpNGmpcjqrTO70M0/mZw J2whXrgrMSgNA2bF/EnORraotMTr1jOLUH2+VdzOvWqTyL9WNClmgrw1Wc+UIfzuYfFR hDgjM95sRBpoUHVTIMUTI27ZgAwxpW/BwdYyZyY9T0uLCC2nIYE9QsY9/0OK8Cva1hg3 c7bw== Received: by 10.50.57.167 with SMTP id j7mr422627igq.53.1342226516837; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.86.139 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:41:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120714001343.GA6879@waltdnes.org> References: <4FFD7949.4000204@gentoo.org> <20120712034036.GA2439@waltdnes.org> <4FFED31D.9010505@gentoo.org> <20120712200741.GB3723@waltdnes.org> <20120712222931.GA3044@linux1> <20120713200449.GA6292@waltdnes.org> <50008143.3050708@gentoo.org> <20120714001343.GA6879@waltdnes.org> From: Maxim Kammerer Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 03:41:36 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <-> mdev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlH4hyE3svILkRCQT3LM0NZS9yiTEdGU/LHB3cLR/CNU5bhxopTTHj6zqkr3rN4LcAyzXBj X-Archives-Salt: 2e2e9b68-8aac-4dbf-992a-61ef8a7aaa2c X-Archives-Hash: 8b8aead3dcccea50ec5bb55b5ab90279 On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > Do you realize this would effectively kill linux in the embedded > device area? Udev, even without the systemd code, is simply to large > for embedded devices. What's =93too large=94? Udev already looks pretty small to me (116k udevd, 50k libudev, 500k resident memory), and I didn't even try compiling it with all extra features switched off. If that's too large for an embedded device, does that device really need (or can handle) anything more than devtmpfs? --=20 Maxim Kammerer Libert=E9 Linux: http://dee.su/liberte