From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S8IZY-0000yl-9S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:51:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83AC5E086C; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D95E07AB for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggni4 with SMTP id i4so4423884ggn.40 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:49:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dee.su; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bQjHC74Oc5Son2khqXUi5yq6ZWvSWpOKmaR/Jr1ulHo=; b=HH81lLg4kviqJclw4W8o8BtrGK7k8/kyme+++1KwZ0XVR1HAlnFNKUMvGXiZIXdQFi a8ikff8i3WiPZnLYNa6PfUb4UYRM/oLWW/hHwGTFrsUbfsgGaaZ6ybvrO0ZcXS/Xpk// 33//99aYc5SmrifuAwHh5SlQGyLW/Cg99HHMQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=bQjHC74Oc5Son2khqXUi5yq6ZWvSWpOKmaR/Jr1ulHo=; b=C9BcRZdGVfD7fclxPN/g4fPckiMIeaUUL2BQIh1ymq9fMlt3lc/tf+pM8DGD5SaDbx zM5/yXfOUJr+X/RmdQ7aG6QUXT1nltWJIdlBg7x8FvOM4TxwvXoN7pfKquyLNgX4VCWi Jqyt43whsxrhCTw3vQDKn9Ra/l4S9XJpOg0GVeZiVMwzhY40+BlvokaOFhWhHRWjGXX7 D2D0tczC1n0Z1c8bBbDtdL1moffDtMtm+JPoxI1DRtdy3eCAQCwoIJ8+CahELykpUbdz mHctKYuqP4lUAGknqAiaDxmqfizssiyyvqRIGwEDrRYoRL7Qe55dR2W/8oDFmWR15dHM DiJw== Received: by 10.60.7.200 with SMTP id l8mr229793oea.52.1331848197085; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.90.42 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:49:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F6254E6.1080609@cs.stonybrook.edu> References: <20120314150827.53dc8336@googlemail.com> <20120314152209.GA2157@kroah.com> <4F60D585.4050206@gentoo.org> <4F60E9C1.7050600@gentoo.org> <20120314210456.GB11179@kroah.com> <4F611E09.1040602@cs.stonybrook.edu> <20120314224916.GA12279@kroah.com> <4F61294B.9040101@cs.stonybrook.edu> <4F61E1EA.3040705@gentoo.org> <4F6254E6.1080609@cs.stonybrook.edu> From: Maxim Kammerer Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:49:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlXdW4Dg0dz0/d3f6WAS/2XJgtZjlAbmg4KRto3nJ0xZfscmn8T4UAfIk7fO6BfYVVXr4OV X-Archives-Salt: e0629cc3-7939-4b6c-bda4-1ab229574f8b X-Archives-Hash: f48a794dcdb7db00fc22360a081b1cbe On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 22:45, Richard Yao wrote: > I know the UnionFS developer offline. I will ask him what the status of > unionFS is the next time I see him. :) Unionfs patchset is regularly released for new kernels, and bugs are fixed. I wouldn't call the project "dead", I would call it "mature" and "stable". I am not aware of the current state of affairs wrt. Unionfs vs. aufs, and whether the propaganda at unionfs.org still holds water, though. Too bad that there is no stacking filesystem in the mainline kernel. --=20 Maxim Kammerer Libert=E9 Linux (discussion / support: http://dee.su/liberte-contribute)