From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-50457-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1S8IZY-0000yl-9S
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:51:00 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83AC5E086C;
	Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:50:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D95E07AB
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:49:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ggni4 with SMTP id i4so4423884ggn.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=dee.su; s=google;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=bQjHC74Oc5Son2khqXUi5yq6ZWvSWpOKmaR/Jr1ulHo=;
        b=HH81lLg4kviqJclw4W8o8BtrGK7k8/kyme+++1KwZ0XVR1HAlnFNKUMvGXiZIXdQFi
         a8ikff8i3WiPZnLYNa6PfUb4UYRM/oLWW/hHwGTFrsUbfsgGaaZ6ybvrO0ZcXS/Xpk//
         33//99aYc5SmrifuAwHh5SlQGyLW/Cg99HHMQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=bQjHC74Oc5Son2khqXUi5yq6ZWvSWpOKmaR/Jr1ulHo=;
        b=C9BcRZdGVfD7fclxPN/g4fPckiMIeaUUL2BQIh1ymq9fMlt3lc/tf+pM8DGD5SaDbx
         zM5/yXfOUJr+X/RmdQ7aG6QUXT1nltWJIdlBg7x8FvOM4TxwvXoN7pfKquyLNgX4VCWi
         Jqyt43whsxrhCTw3vQDKn9Ra/l4S9XJpOg0GVeZiVMwzhY40+BlvokaOFhWhHRWjGXX7
         D2D0tczC1n0Z1c8bBbDtdL1moffDtMtm+JPoxI1DRtdy3eCAQCwoIJ8+CahELykpUbdz
         mHctKYuqP4lUAGknqAiaDxmqfizssiyyvqRIGwEDrRYoRL7Qe55dR2W/8oDFmWR15dHM
         DiJw==
Received: by 10.60.7.200 with SMTP id l8mr229793oea.52.1331848197085; Thu, 15
 Mar 2012 14:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.90.42 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F6254E6.1080609@cs.stonybrook.edu>
References: <20120314150827.53dc8336@googlemail.com> <20120314152209.GA2157@kroah.com>
 <CAHsXYDDkoYrfNFP_Hmwezxcvi2zgZVXqO-yf9Ad_e=vQVAQJQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F60D585.4050206@gentoo.org> <CAET+hMQ4vgxp9CXLzfo39sPzfaUzP0ygOURif86WpHJDqw_=0A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHsXYDDMuGGH0hDZ8_8G0-M05pzdEcjjyCn8dG9ruF29dxFByw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F60E9C1.7050600@gentoo.org> <CALc3eMXcs=1kGvL4Jz-+2HyoxCxug4jAqjokWVGk=6jDAmeQug@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120314210456.GB11179@kroah.com> <4F611E09.1040602@cs.stonybrook.edu>
 <20120314224916.GA12279@kroah.com> <4F61294B.9040101@cs.stonybrook.edu>
 <4F61E1EA.3040705@gentoo.org> <4F6254E6.1080609@cs.stonybrook.edu>
From: Maxim Kammerer <mk@dee.su>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:49:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHsXYDBCseLViq6TP-OSXRLtc9qsu3Jp+AUnHHQHe+5B=+z28w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlXdW4Dg0dz0/d3f6WAS/2XJgtZjlAbmg4KRto3nJ0xZfscmn8T4UAfIk7fO6BfYVVXr4OV
X-Archives-Salt: e0629cc3-7939-4b6c-bda4-1ab229574f8b
X-Archives-Hash: f48a794dcdb7db00fc22360a081b1cbe

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 22:45, Richard Yao <ryao@cs.stonybrook.edu> wrote:
> I know the UnionFS developer offline. I will ask him what the status of
> unionFS is the next time I see him. :)

Unionfs patchset is regularly released for new kernels, and bugs are
fixed. I wouldn't call the project "dead", I would call it "mature"
and "stable". I am not aware of the current state of affairs wrt.
Unionfs vs. aufs, and whether the propaganda at unionfs.org still
holds water, though. Too bad that there is no stacking filesystem in
the mainline kernel.

--=20
Maxim Kammerer
Libert=E9 Linux (discussion / support: http://dee.su/liberte-contribute)