From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-58409-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE601389A1
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:05:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53CE421C028;
Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:05:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ea0-f176.google.com (mail-ea0-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17EAB21C001
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:05:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ea0-f176.google.com with SMTP id a13so2681028eaa.7
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:05:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=dee.su; s=google;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=XbxWrc1hgeUjhUhoLKTpVbOADiDST7LoJfS5RnK/5pE=;
b=TlCknjjmw7KRmef9GhovTHiplGa4d+jeds8KlWeBvsGUUGvZf8TzZ7QSx/oRraf/Wk
wvHY7UlROGGd6d/XsDPLM+wFivaxVDf4TdrHiFBG1m/RkUiP6Ay0GPHydYD/KM3JGhYi
7awFPfY04dpYFM2Q460zxPjX9kDDKDVLBvp1Y=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
:x-gm-message-state;
bh=XbxWrc1hgeUjhUhoLKTpVbOADiDST7LoJfS5RnK/5pE=;
b=FNvHJ09yt/TgEn8WgGH/ekqi3PSBVvJj6TCu/9DaEgwDd+iXZc8ao7W5wavD95DG4R
qdr/84mYLoV8KvZXa/W2lEzQGVhIhvmz0FB2tGbfzfdcsfJf64cWne/WlXnRPPwJqH63
8gOCb8jRfnv6PKn+2DLSO0A6VIZDk6gMUEErGCScYo1Nc3ENAf9tq9hLkxSXdJN/bPkx
ajRSUwjDKyRnKIVqsOaLhJ+6LOiqFaSLdl/yjBuCoZQcXZndBil3PErrrq82OPP7mEn/
ryYLctBNPLUJvuRUn2O6SO2JgLFVp2tNWuGu+389csbZlYHOJ7v5UPlF5YbLCzMBde+W
oHnw==
X-Received: by 10.14.182.5 with SMTP id n5mr51095490eem.9.1360598728356; Mon,
11 Feb 2013 08:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.204.2 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:04:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <511910F2.4010409@gentoo.org>
References: <CAHsXYDBX4pqWMaA9ftWU+X002XCKR4kC9ikcOcw4pdhmXGgnbg@mail.gmail.com>
<511910F2.4010409@gentoo.org>
From: Maxim Kammerer <mk@dee.su>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:04:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHsXYDAC+3_HobTg8C4e7gW5jsSaMBtkMkJOpjvMqVVf2C7aSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libusb-compat preference in virtual/libusb:0 not
strong enough?
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnLmG1a45Kofnmcfevh2ktNbSXNhoOd/jeCkCPIdvvBmTHqCAKKDqAR6hK92awC9dUTesB5
X-Archives-Salt: 2202bfe3-5dc9-4688-9153-79f9b6066aff
X-Archives-Hash: 8e446de8f3ecb87a0a78a99c0b17af23
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> wrote:
> If you can reproduce the problem, then
> please create a debug logs as follows, and attach it to a bug on
> bugs.gentoo.org:
Can't reproduce with stage3 + emerge -upvDN. :/
I will look out for this issue in full system builds in the future.
--=20
Maxim Kammerer
Libert=E9 Linux: http://dee.su/liberte