From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqt08-0007qh-5K for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:06:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB03BE0855; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbhh.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.177]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440F0E0848 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CCF3BC06A for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:05:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=zx2c4.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: content-type; q=dns; s=zx2c4.com; b=sLeNgNK5JSJ6QNCJl4C4Eo/qtTlD JMoKrIkkphvWLyUfaaJ1ShHNalnTeWZAxIPrjwrQBEeuqtH1FLiXyWHWheoAsYDM p4/T0zpm+6shanAi1hFBbFwagTKC26p65fNw63w4Kl8tFgYE0TtJezQ3h36D1U8M OZJUfOjWCrqU4TM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: content-type; s=zx2c4.com; bh=dX9fxRp42dU7erzyQNGfFdJsQHE=; b=uQ XfSis3MT2B5aYOHfXNJ6kHjwlSMIn5qIvHA0xEY+oKir7zNUwog02VHErgv81122 Yli0EThRjLdEykM6cdNhIBjAHCuZ/BZvy6Tgl8yllyB+d1qb8gXq2TF9QfaI1JZ4 b5maRvXHy9q8n6qxO5O3/mQ6K6gLZk1y64JuQKf4M= Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com (mail-qw0-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jason@zx2c4.com) by homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E5083BC063 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:05:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by qafk1 with SMTP id k1so583825qaf.19 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:05:13 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.198.65 with SMTP id en1mr10791651qab.81.1327698313923; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:05:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.89.205 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:05:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F230577.7060602@gentoo.org> References: <201201240058.50060.vapier@gentoo.org> <4F22FD6C.2020807@gentoo.org> <20120127194527.GT71369@gentoo.org> <4F230577.7060602@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:05:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300fb11b5ecac304b788da47 X-Archives-Salt: c7b59fc8-e6f4-4399-9709-4b515b50234b X-Archives-Hash: bedc612d4da3a7eff64768315fac8993 --20cf300fb11b5ecac304b788da47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 21:13, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > Again - only if we don't get a consensus here. > > Wait... Is anybody here *actually opposed* to not enabling PIE on *SUID binaries*? --20cf300fb11b5ecac304b788da47 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 21:13, "Paw= e=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
Again - only if we don't get a consensus here.


Wait... Is anybody here actually opposed=C2=A0to not= enabling PIE on SUID binaries?=C2=A0
--20cf300fb11b5ecac304b788da47--