From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7421381F4 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E307E05D5; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbbj.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.119]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AEBE019D for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCDD280070 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:10:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=zx2c4.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: content-type; q=dns; s=zx2c4.com; b=U7fxTu8eLpgQ1FgGRB/2D4+z7Acl lz7Txt583g2En55eKtiJkxc5Pk5ST4j4X0sd5ON/oVZ3raxp4X+Ptajbxw7FQIRo zVq4q2ES4Rmjcp1+s+pjLI4CTdXOVEI3HhxZgsibhI9N+d7uxJnIKUVGSHpZumq7 iGOoxHclmeSh5Yc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: content-type; s=zx2c4.com; bh=fK9EeMt1AegT6K9e0h20BLvgirs=; b=BH Ds4mI8R8OnOG64UEYxCsGTxa+rR+OwwCh5bbS93abfxvOwxOahnJVN5sNiJU/WHG MX6fqs0ZaOutg9otsvd6tPVXwKO5XHf2XzeZy9TjDbwtkSkZngE/Zjeki9ysT7FY ZxBJsWRftYGdAk2t1cLNEKxaM2pf6nhsEZZ6JJUxA= Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jason@zx2c4.com) by homiemail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D45D828006D for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vbbfc26 with SMTP id fc26so3131336vbb.40 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:10:18 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.243.138 with SMTP id wy10mr4045495vec.46.1344787818533; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:10:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.236.72 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:10:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5022784C.5040201@gentoo.org> References: <20120808161551.425c8e62@pomiocik.lan> <5022784C.5040201@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:10:18 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Global Systemd USE Flag From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: b46bf214-2444-454e-b2a5-1b68254e7838 X-Archives-Hash: 948dbe437bd8aad9e388c31c664c0d6f On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > equery f udev | grep udevd > > /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd > > > And as long as our maintainers refuse to use the proper paths this is > just one of the little things that makes life more exciting for us. > > Can we please add some sanity back? > The gods heard your call, and have replied: > Yes, udev on non-systemd systems is in our eyes a dead end, in case you > haven't noticed it yet. I am looking forward to the day when we can drop > that support entirely. -- Lennart [1] [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-August/006066.html