[gentoo-dev] OK to unmask icu-50?

[gentoo-dev] OK to unmask icu-50?

["Paweł Hajdan, Jr."]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 256 bytes --]

# Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@> (04 Nov 2012)
# Masked for testing with gcc-4.7 and to verify reverse deps
>dev-libs/icu-49.9.1

I think with icu-50.1-r2 the problems are solved. It should get more
testing in ~arch. I'd like to unmask it.

WDYT?


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 203 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] OK to unmask icu-50?

[Diego Elio Pettenò]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 769 bytes --]

Sounds good to me. Tinderbox was fine with the latest changes to icu.

Just for reference, next time it would be nice to unmask this when chromium
and libreoffice are both bumped (i.e., two days ago), so that people don't
have to rebuild them twice... luckily for me I kept it unmasked when
testing it ;)

Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flameeyes@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/



On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:58 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
<phajdan.jr@gentoo.org>wrote:

> # Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@> (04 Nov 2012)
> # Masked for testing with gcc-4.7 and to verify reverse deps
> >dev-libs/icu-49.9.1
>
> I think with icu-50.1-r2 the problems are solved. It should get more
> testing in ~arch. I'd like to unmask it.
>
> WDYT?
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1257 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] OK to unmask icu-50?

["Paweł Hajdan, Jr."]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 633 bytes --]

On 12/7/12 11:51 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Sounds good to me. Tinderbox was fine with the latest changes to icu.
> 
> Just for reference, next time it would be nice to unmask this when chromium
> and libreoffice are both bumped (i.e., two days ago), so that people don't
> have to rebuild them twice... luckily for me I kept it unmasked when
> testing it ;)

Unmasked for everyone then.

Thank you for testing.

I think this is quite a good moment for unmasking: I've just done a dev
channel bump of Chromium, we're going to have a stable one for security
issues, and beta has been done 3 days ago.

Paweł


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 203 bytes --]