From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113821389E2 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F2FDE083E; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23694E082D for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z20so3466713igj.4 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:57:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VlDeVtkF+pq05PJyR1Csz/cWtFPQ+hY2V/dLs4GEl+8=; b=BC14z0TJXYOWxIb+UEhKp5zRjI3R4vkLDCY5xwDQkXTWnxDZL9KejG29bvu1OXN4ZQ zN3A/qKBYttQqleCkEyytz0AXSZrZqwZx2ykmbjI0jfOuDumx/YuAtDsLo8Z7u/2XC8n NG0FcYX7MG/yeLSbOjJJTf1u7jrA1Z64UH7vqxKHYItsqggsZhVQIC4Lo+/tDuX4moMB l0JhDLuICqBKC0rOvmQzNGCP+GlkkgRLUmlQkFTMY/BKbLUwTCiUbTtBmCtRIhs7EAyv Rwuh1lHqxFxqwCYCZ0GnzOmifuxq8p3ZtUeFFUxq29ACKrW5B28K5e21YzE9p4WXQy9O c6Nw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnzoCcTxw+HTEFybwJ+q9plHnGbra66vUzaICzqxpr+F8e8ttOa9I0Zi7sHyoHOzGJ5iIM0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.172.194 with SMTP id o2mr4781187icz.95.1417035457020; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:57:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.3.65 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:57:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.3.65 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:57:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <547624CE.1080005@gentoo.org> References: <54722BA8.4090300@gentoo.org> <54761F6C.7010802@gentoo.org> <547624CE.1080005@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:57:36 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Doomsayers needed From: =?UTF-8?Q?Diego_Elio_Petten=C3=B2?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e83420cde250508c9472a X-Archives-Salt: 47378c5b-260e-444a-b2f2-6eddd472f1ae X-Archives-Hash: 2d862be2c28c65e78bfedcc06ae4e91b --90e6ba6e83420cde250508c9472a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 26 Nov 2014 11:07, "Michael Orlitzky" wrote: > > On 11/26/2014 01:43 PM, Sergey Popov wrote: > > > > Standart - cross-compilation and prefix. If you do not care about the > > latter(not having keywords for your package) - it's ok. > > Cross-compilation, or compilation into another root is trickier - you > > should support it. > > > > With ping and ping6 coming from net-misc/iputils, wouldn't the command > syntax be the same under prefix, except with $EROOT instead of $ROOT? > > And with the command set to ${ROOT}bin/ping, building for a Gentoo > system under another root should work, right? No, $ROOT should not seep into the compiled code. --90e6ba6e83420cde250508c9472a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On 26 Nov 2014 11:07, "Michael Orlitzky" <mjo@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/26/2014 01:43 PM, Sergey Popov wrote:
> >
> > Standart - cross-compilation and prefix. If you do not care about the
> > latter(not having keywords for your package) - it's ok.
> > Cross-compilation, or compilation into another root is trickier - you
> > should support it.
> >
>
> With ping and ping6 coming from net-misc/iputils, wouldn't the command
> syntax be the same under prefix, except with $EROOT instead of $ROOT?
>
> And with the command set to ${ROOT}bin/ping, building for a Gentoo
> system under another root should work, right?

No, $ROOT should not seep into the compiled code.

--90e6ba6e83420cde250508c9472a--