From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB561381F3 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 20:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CF7EE0A5B; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 20:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ia0-f169.google.com (mail-ia0-f169.google.com [209.85.210.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32617E08BE for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 20:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f169.google.com with SMTP id h23so3259726iae.28 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:41:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=UDWN9OsH8xnIMCxE6laYi8Q40qvlgqNeOdDHXXTUXwk=; b=oTrkd5jRM/TLEVSaqkti3ltrCuzXROTFzAF4CW91TmxJlzyLhHkClPF6D1PhMmp9CR /RtFmBSugiMrBe3SOiW6JZWSe8vn7BewpuHhE1UqzYFXNY0cBLayEuWuMTsh8O0nLq+j SRezAJ1GWjIwJEV61Pskw1BsHVndoBzg+KfoPEomWTdtFCXMmwZoeMXaF0ME4Vv2JQnj L3MaV4jfFmiv0ECYWRaoyP1hL1CGsZLLV4OLSPtsVYZOtn6KGhlr+i62NK33PDQjbj2a OXFkEM8vGUR6RxW/Vpf9xa0xlJBaMD13H/64HYZZk0Hfw1LmO/zfQg3LsnNoS3L6p+jb 8x/Q== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.155.66 with SMTP id t2mr7201745icw.10.1365885689365; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:41:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.68.34 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:41:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20130413194314.GA31253@linux1> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:41:29 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new eclass: systemd-next.eclass From: =?UTF-8?Q?Diego_Elio_Petten=C3=B2?= To: "gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org" Cc: Samuli Suominen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnG3UW6I2CjR+fd3dLUpDO/6w7VzgSPbH8Q/HpveKIR2QlgJRJItKNqWXonPkGop/gOdA8g X-Archives-Salt: ace938cb-35e0-458f-99b2-73a951feac1a X-Archives-Hash: ed229dd30a4670e2a8cd653432122811 It's happening that we seem to have a bunch of crybabies in Gentoo that don't get along together and instead of figuring out their differences are going to screw up users even more. Bunch of chipmunks in our ranks as well I suppose. Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 Flameeyes flameeyes@flameeyes.eu =E2=80=94 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 3:43 PM, William Hubbs wrot= e: >> I am sending this out for review so we can commit it to the tree >> when we commit our alternate systemd ebuild in a few days. This will be >> set up so that users can choose which systemd package they want to >> install, and it will default to the current systemd package. > > Did I miss some kind of announcement for what is going on here? An > additional implementation in portage along with an eclass probably is > worth some kind of intro on-list. I don't think you need to seek > approval/etc, but it would be nice to know what your goals/etc are. > Is this just a different installation/configuration approach, or is > this some kind of upstream fork? > > Rich >