From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597FA138247 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3E38E0B0A; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com (mail-ie0-f176.google.com [209.85.223.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA2BAE0AF0 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id x13so3297203ief.21 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:45:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tB+/0I4TaQkRdDct7JbX5E5ZI/F6/HR2F2akfHiiq+o=; b=BJcLD03rgVzkV8nUWhhIyMtU0Poz1/AxOsFd4NwImU8PjnYiL734kq6/UV8XaE9pcP mR7d8dqCf/UZDXj9zFOuKUXCRffh2gZ6kd618GstKg0sQn73z0V+TyLDimBYcZLNHXCL 7xlDI3nxjgKw4PAHwhpDGFLWZGQ097Opuw5FWOvHOiwDAv7bhv3Jh4WQ7/vRbQ45szuo LixMYYjKh6KzuOHsrSbYIwSm4XgkGAt1yf+7ld+hzBmWY6qGQRQ397ZjPbDHaTfB3KFR t8P1L9J+pjveaoLVTCJG/HCtfWaaQgDwHazW5fCIuv5Y2jmmgdkOpCCF/rRMLR9L2Oow QwgA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbjXjlwiS9HdkYWtog9kYwzfEyLI0iyKevmBDWancLljcKismG2vF8z18wbmW/Cm5BwAyC Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.21.6 with SMTP id r6mr2504133ige.44.1384458331477; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:45:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.86.230 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:45:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131113210813.6541d56f@caribou.gateway.pace.com> References: <5280A447.8050707@gentoo.org> <20131113210813.6541d56f@caribou.gateway.pace.com> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:45:31 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Package removal without proper last-riting From: =?UTF-8?Q?Diego_Elio_Petten=C3=B2?= To: "gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba9724e0df83a04eb28530d X-Archives-Salt: c49fe7c4-87ef-46d4-9dfb-bfafc8b45580 X-Archives-Hash: 40d8d6e1e66cd9952766016d34b54bd8 --047d7ba9724e0df83a04eb28530d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > I wasn't aware last-riting had become general policy. It was originally > started by the treecleaner team to give people time to object to > maintainer-needed removals, and others thought it was a good idea, but it > was > always up to the discretion of the maintainer back then. > Last riting predates treecleaners by quite a bit. Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 Flameeyes flameeyes@flameeyes.eu =E2=80=94 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ --047d7ba9724e0df83a04eb28530d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>= ; wrote:
I= wasn't aware last-riting had become general policy. =C2=A0It was origi= nally
started by the treecleaner team to give people time to object to
maintainer-needed removals, and others thought it was a good idea, but it w= as
always up to the discretion of the maintainer back then.
=

Last riting predates treecleaners by quite a bit.


Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80= =94 Flameeyes
flameeyes@flame= eyes.eu =E2=80=94 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
--047d7ba9724e0df83a04eb28530d--