From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-63564-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597FA138247
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:45:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3E38E0B0A;
Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:45:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com (mail-ie0-f176.google.com [209.85.223.176])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA2BAE0AF0
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:45:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id x13so3297203ief.21
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:45:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=tB+/0I4TaQkRdDct7JbX5E5ZI/F6/HR2F2akfHiiq+o=;
b=BJcLD03rgVzkV8nUWhhIyMtU0Poz1/AxOsFd4NwImU8PjnYiL734kq6/UV8XaE9pcP
mR7d8dqCf/UZDXj9zFOuKUXCRffh2gZ6kd618GstKg0sQn73z0V+TyLDimBYcZLNHXCL
7xlDI3nxjgKw4PAHwhpDGFLWZGQ097Opuw5FWOvHOiwDAv7bhv3Jh4WQ7/vRbQ45szuo
LixMYYjKh6KzuOHsrSbYIwSm4XgkGAt1yf+7ld+hzBmWY6qGQRQ397ZjPbDHaTfB3KFR
t8P1L9J+pjveaoLVTCJG/HCtfWaaQgDwHazW5fCIuv5Y2jmmgdkOpCCF/rRMLR9L2Oow
QwgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbjXjlwiS9HdkYWtog9kYwzfEyLI0iyKevmBDWancLljcKismG2vF8z18wbmW/Cm5BwAyC
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.21.6 with SMTP id r6mr2504133ige.44.1384458331477; Thu,
14 Nov 2013 11:45:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.86.230 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:45:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20131113210813.6541d56f@caribou.gateway.pace.com>
References: <5280A447.8050707@gentoo.org>
<20131113210813.6541d56f@caribou.gateway.pace.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:45:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CAHcsgXRk_XtxcUoBssaOiZWVOuFSwL5TBFYX2RS+9WF9THvCYg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Package removal without proper last-riting
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Diego_Elio_Petten=C3=B2?= <flameeyes@flameeyes.eu>
To: "gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org" <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba9724e0df83a04eb28530d
X-Archives-Salt: c49fe7c4-87ef-46d4-9dfb-bfafc8b45580
X-Archives-Hash: 40d8d6e1e66cd9952766016d34b54bd8
--047d7ba9724e0df83a04eb28530d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I wasn't aware last-riting had become general policy. It was originally
> started by the treecleaner team to give people time to object to
> maintainer-needed removals, and others thought it was a good idea, but it
> was
> always up to the discretion of the maintainer back then.
>
Last riting predates treecleaners by quite a bit.
Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 Flameeyes
flameeyes@flameeyes.eu =E2=80=94 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
--047d7ba9724e0df83a04eb28530d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Ryan Hill <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D=
"mailto:dirtyepic@gentoo.org" target=3D"_blank">dirtyepic@gentoo.org</a>>=
;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=3D":2di" style=3D"overflow:hidden">I=
wasn't aware last-riting had become general policy. =C2=A0It was origi=
nally<br>
started by the treecleaner team to give people time to object to<br>
maintainer-needed removals, and others thought it was a good idea, but it w=
as<br>
always up to the discretion of the maintainer back then.</div></blockquote>=
</div><br>Last riting predates treecleaners by quite a bit.</div><div class=
=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br clear=3D"all"><div>Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=
=94 Flameeyes<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:flameeyes@flameeyes.eu" target=3D"_blank">flameeyes@flame=
eyes.eu</a> =E2=80=94 <a href=3D"http://blog.flameeyes.eu/" target=3D"_blan=
k">http://blog.flameeyes.eu/</a></div>
</div></div>
--047d7ba9724e0df83a04eb28530d--