From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1931381F3 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88653E0A98; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ia0-f174.google.com (mail-ia0-f174.google.com [209.85.210.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3738E0980 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h23so1839489iae.33 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:45:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=MNh7ssBdQ9iJtTXioTZdAdzFwKjc89qOkiKqyzQD2j8=; b=H6zaJxr3o9pVbbTKeKh4RvbVkt2cwmHukCdnX+RK6GvWuSlO2oOS9I7xpFLWlD0HLy P6DunQyBYkDZiP/mVcZhKIjFo4Lqxw1KinxtbWV8bXfMZS/jV53hzC1fE2CyJLjOOYUT hGvCZhb8uqqHI4dluxyw0S5BCSvJomGZSfhYhmGPyt88SayXmsdEjADte6n2vRUT4m9v wDUPs6mMTu9fxf7HUxXnMtbHHIw5R+zsRx5T83RkkduD9uz79KAZg9SUInVR1ZQGQVBC XcCtS4CbWe+CWpC4InyO1YZ8L1PcmxK8DBuDfh9WW7WYNWFLYXdUeB7Hr0FU65TphLDA fg7A== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.87.71 with SMTP id v7mr22777552igz.96.1366821904549; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:45:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.13.171 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:45:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130424161606.GA1607@linux1> References: <20130424161606.GA1607@linux1> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:45:04 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC From: =?UTF-8?Q?Diego_Elio_Petten=C3=B2?= To: "gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQndoLtLfzCUOQqLV+Eu1quYtIYiBpcIaEtN+wQzuDo2XKESYf19JvWV5YVLWsYA2eJYFbHV X-Archives-Salt: 12f3a3a5-ac3b-49d2-9411-e8afc9d4737e X-Archives-Hash: a21df85ab7e872cc7d387be62fef90c6 Please don't do this. It sounds to me like a stupid move, what are you trying to accomplish? You already use Git/GitHub... Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 Flameeyes flameeyes@flameeyes.eu =E2=80=94 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > it has been suggested that gentoo's oldnet scripts be split out into > their own package separate from OpenRC so that they can be developed > independently. I am looking at doing this for OpenRC 0.12, which I hope > to release soon. > > This means when you emerge or upgrade to openrc-0.12, the net.* scripts > will no longer be included. I am going to call the separate package that > includes these scripts gentoo-oldnet. > > My plan is to write a newsitem when OpenRC 0.12 is released > telling users this and that they will have to emerge gentoo-oldnet to > get the gentoo networking scripts or turn on the newnet (maybe I'll > change this to net) use flag to get OpenRC's network scripts installed > and put ewarns in the ebuild if this use flag is turned off. > > I feel that a newsitem and ewarns in the OpenRC ebuild cover live > systems well. In a nutshell, users should pay attention to their news > items and ewarns. > > On the other hand, some are suggesting that I should add a runtime > dependency to OpenRC so that it pulls in gentoo-oldnet. Since OpenRC > doesn't need gentoo-oldnet in order to run, I feel like this would be > abusing dependencies. > > Does anyone have any thoughts? > > William >