From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-54112-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443B4138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 06:02:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98ACBE09B6;
	Sat, 18 Aug 2012 06:01:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20312E0662
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 06:01:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vbbfc26 with SMTP id fc26so4372463vbb.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=oJ8TBBVAy5zhfXXtZiIYoh6InA6WPVxWkoBe0JOoS3k=;
        b=gAh9klumfh1SGep60ROHpxYmnv4SINGlvVgl5jfXxcC/kpXNyixhN3hB+HSemABG1s
         uHWHGMIIJyGAVlw7jsfNbi/OdOwCn7i/fZM3avIPn4pTnlK4mhjIf5YwclO0/30U7rHC
         t/3hdQvdyPwLTyZRbHz9tN0DMAdADgoQKwIUJtTnuLBv7CkjC8sgdEifQRzUWDKBVETP
         CSaqh4guSHLodlsDoVVSkkbnZtkxHVD5rqJxfrcYcycI5gpNpGC5OkJTCiegJaNxbYiV
         tiN1OUw2te3aTmAqmgJdKUb33W42b1mcxTANbrzFl4ldTI7TM0ywKBzHMQ6QXa4+fbhI
         8zTw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.0.82 with SMTP id 18mr5001148vec.0.1345269672379; Fri, 17
 Aug 2012 23:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.65.66 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201208180144.09328.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <201208172331.36888.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<CAHcsgXTKHrd6mBJCVCaLrfjOqvGHowCdDez9daSjdM69i4E7Qw@mail.gmail.com>
	<201208180144.09328.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:01:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHcsgXRHVOUVkbJnd35Aajvm2sqY+rpyt3_n8PnMeEuLjZw55A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.16 moving to ~arch
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Diego_Elio_Petten=C3=B2?= <flameeyes@flameeyes.eu>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmvf6kKt4e59yYOFe9HfpATJNmAPzlFEFgsM1on6UlqWWWWD1VNMVfDfZ24/8KJODdVaePQ
X-Archives-Salt: 89b087e7-adee-4d37-a898-7364039efbc0
X-Archives-Hash: 65329eabc099ee55f757a2d2bb77b9c7

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work.  forcing people to use 1.50
> is purely the boost's maintainers choice.

[...]

> there's a trivial patch long been available that you've refused to merge.  so
> any errors here are of your choosing.

So you pretend that people apply "trivial patches" because you're in a
hurry to unmask something, but when it's time to actually do some
fixing yourself you procrastinate because you don't like the way the
bug is open?

What a team player uh?

Just for the sake of argument, why don't you instead look at
https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=421391&hide_resolved=1
and see that two bugs blocking the tracker are actually from herds
you're part of?

And on https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=boost-1.50&hide_resolved=1
I count four just for games.