From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF62138247 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37F27E0D6B; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 593BDE0D67 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id k19so17068151igc.1 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 12:24:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qPoRkE+n0XfN6jRuRczWz8tghOmD3Oky7E99cI+SiLo=; b=ZihkEeNQhDTQ1PIi6zzAI1Kgo2MJBywk9QMoLbqq/9i0PLqC4aPasR3qKsTL/G7kLx +x1DETUsVxVLzWTuryLt+zU+BX+bo9tHwN1CGi1/wxY0q5qZkWSCfZx9q4yHCWD2fmYb vAqFQjqB8kRR6iygfDOd/qEKJf5GFNdkzAJm+PEodcqI4r/99GDYnEKRKR9Qr2jkuIFm fO0G2BQ9eemgBHyM2oPnjEjnhlMusb7/nmorD3KeCgnQwY5Oe7vfgifR+2cigGYk4L8o BJC2TtB/Uh/DgBfuZpMUsLpf2k5sGZjuvqd00iujXX/QXRvpZL0BRm9cQmp5cPcC+Baw iSvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk6dVkvmhJWcb9Q1GjsxiqtefP1RNTeJN+8ABdRLnFuFE6yAN1qMeWj587FKIcc99s5yDMR Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.90.143 with SMTP id k15mr4139872icm.25.1389299040401; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 12:24:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.86.230 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:24:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201401091521.00050.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <1386598800.12112.7.camel@belkin5> <52A636D9.7050904@gentoo.org> <201401091521.00050.vapier@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:24:00 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status From: =?UTF-8?Q?Diego_Elio_Petten=C3=B2?= To: "gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba614ab0ca520704ef8f63e5 X-Archives-Salt: e192bdcb-1b6f-41e9-b170-0db50a13d674 X-Archives-Hash: 64949d244d188ee4cede435a209a40e3 --90e6ba614ab0ca520704ef8f63e5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 9 January 2014 20:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > well, the sep herd was kind of by design ... i didn't want it cluttering = up > base-system@ and it is super convenient to abdicate all PAM decisions to = a > single herd. Yeah the problem has been that the herd has been fundamentally a single person, and when said single person asked for the rest of the users of/providers for PAM to accentrate on a single package, they ignored/worked around problems instead of reporting/discussing them. Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 Flameeyes flameeyes@flameeyes.eu =E2=80=94 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ --90e6ba614ab0ca520704ef8f63e5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 9 January 2014 20:20, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> = wrote:

well, the sep herd was kind of by design ... i didn't want it clu= ttering up
base-system@ and it is super convenient to abdicate all PAM decisions to a<= br> single herd.

Yeah the problem has been that the herd = has been fundamentally a single person, and when said single person asked f= or the rest of the users of/providers for PAM to accentrate on a single pac= kage, they ignored/worked around problems instead of reporting/discussing t= hem.

Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 Flameeyes
flameeyes@flameeyes.= eu =E2=80=94 ht= tp://blog.flameeyes.eu/
--90e6ba614ab0ca520704ef8f63e5--