From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35CC138247 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 19:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E61EFE0A5F; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 19:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f172.google.com (mail-ig0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043FEE09B1 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 19:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hl1so106863igb.5 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:42:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6gfezZLsNHyq9wn4p6TPlhH6TCraP+X4gio88HpxBM0=; b=MgLMghP635GrO5QPYbE09XG3nedavZwhQgPx7SG/2n90nVJ+TsQpwTT6vLOluBOLqc nGBtCoVzPhjxZQSud/xMKhvpcTQUGPZ9QyflfpzGOlR9XCzYjUtMXe31k4pquyuvr7MB n/DRRhwFhiZ2VaSorrtLgFQCAXf35NbajiPulqSKiSS0Fc/6tdONUhVeq/+0zj/2amEI jlvoN13X00bjKHIbn15VpaOUwtcsgANa8c+WUdmjFSY9U/wbmrc/eEB2oNRt3/S6dJZd ATKgMQkgt6czsPuFD7XCFP76EcEII+Wwn55tsNGqmzE1/szEJcAWsayUQmO0aXj9eSDA /+SA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmozAYkjTCIn80TqSOruTsd0SD5bFh/C5dDfWn6JJ5bJXW4c+hOuE01bmn2cGHmjbAqnDb4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.79.198 with SMTP id l6mr4389354igx.31.1386358935788; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:42:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.86.230 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:42:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131206162435.7cc53c6c@shanghai.paradoxon.rec> References: <20131206162435.7cc53c6c@shanghai.paradoxon.rec> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 19:42:15 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] =net-fs/samba-4* vs. dev-libs/openssl[kerberos] From: =?UTF-8?Q?Diego_Elio_Petten=C3=B2?= To: "gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org" Cc: dcmwai@gmail.com, samba@gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a1102e6367404ece2d7e0 X-Archives-Salt: 49c1339e-a479-43ee-accb-b52e62a4485b X-Archives-Hash: 45e57b7e31986fb9cfe4d2d01c2006e7 --089e013a1102e6367404ece2d7e0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Lars Wendler wrote= : > The bug reporter suggests to use bundled heimdal from samba-4 which I > would like to avoid if possible. > If the libraries were to expose the symbols of the embedded heimdal, it would solve the obvious build problem and create a bigger one at runtime. Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 Flameeyes flameeyes@flameeyes.eu =E2=80=94 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ --089e013a1102e6367404ece2d7e0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.o= rg> wrote:
T= he bug reporter suggests to use bundled heimdal from samba-4 which I
would like to avoid if possible.

If the librari= es were to expose the symbols of the embedded heimdal, it would solve the o= bvious build problem and create a bigger one at runtime.

Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 Flameeyes
flameeyes@flameeyes.= eu =E2=80=94 ht= tp://blog.flameeyes.eu/
--089e013a1102e6367404ece2d7e0--