From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-83495-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD2D8138206
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 22:50:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACAE2E0897;
	Mon, 15 Jan 2018 22:50:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 330DFE0891
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 22:50:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id e203so15135700lfg.3
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:50:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=n3jhWCew5nVNwBPgvVZe4ylZ+wsc5ydqgFOiej+NLOw=;
        b=WNf3D5tx8AayyV/OH5RbruMZi2ZkA9EjkEml6xb7GZzxcFQq1LtDvSyHT1g5wChLMr
         bJ9Y9dU/zpHCd35IrhMHPEGFIIjTbeIjlUcXeRQ72us6IUswR8e/LJO+UsGnHVu1diGW
         j7lrkgS9GOzIQjjQxlpQUllovwk3L/eSjHIATSpMSNsC6jFnoFBybqKQz9YCtENMuDBD
         Z0oRLvQ3r4CV9FgtD0EWx73kfMbs04+/Ep5eqmgscZeeNKM2ZxJ5Zhuhw/YkP2v1GqEt
         IvnSzR87FY6vKNyBsqvXC0Ld/98HM6a9QsW7OaA+BXmaBim5WfgTYccdbVmpvYujEeSI
         IYwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=n3jhWCew5nVNwBPgvVZe4ylZ+wsc5ydqgFOiej+NLOw=;
        b=q9jFNdreGfCeg3LEBU2KPugUi8AFpE45Ba0NA25rgOeeu8mnI1pvHzK5dgsNbMGQaW
         k/8hDu1AuANo1UcS57hy09FfcYwqNicRs/PQuT9xiwb80RchRtiLVv7RRBewL6/okbQU
         EcqdrIjz0TZB9fUSH666F7kmmPn6FeniIYX/oyGJKBn1rc3XPF5b8piecLxTxWHFmHQj
         hKH/xTnoYoPjepTvuOKtMhzLpgIwKiEpU+2u898Zg5WLWaxPfBlBHYvUPTLQcW2OY3er
         RIULUg+SOBJMX1a11ed8b6+h47NY90NmwdudhMgdtNMDRIpasHBI9nxfHHbNQgaAANjf
         UsNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdy+15aSB9fKwPhnbQ+o4GPSkMfusZ5uKSF9brBjBZBg4ijYi7d
	86MlsAtJLKPjJ8lKpW8tSf2xXTFBi928TURjgzSZvw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotcQtbEKLQ6J8o0OpV6Nu1g246uZz4+9D9+tKxJbxcGI/CnekKY6X9kMWpPmbBibCo1zUJF6ZeCs8tjXmZ+znE=
X-Received: by 10.25.23.81 with SMTP id n78mr6367581lfi.130.1516056617978;
 Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:50:17 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.23.218 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:49:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_nfOAwbDbiPbimqea5CyYTciEgeG_e404RjYeh_Vo6xNw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1685019.DAF74n7IXa@pinacolada> <20180110054855.GA4483@angelfall.a21an.org>
 <20180110085511.71b42c93@abudhabi.paradoxon.rec> <1515581849.31546.22.camel@gentoo.org>
 <CAOdo=SxxBDhP7G0FmirPgWE3kaWXKCd9R1EiyHUDtY32pEicqg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGfcS_nfOAwbDbiPbimqea5CyYTciEgeG_e404RjYeh_Vo6xNw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gordon Pettey <petteyg359@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:49:37 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHY5MefouhVCJx0yUqjHiAdntMO7WBK_xgHDjzoQLFLpXWdYVg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev
 mailing list
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Archives-Salt: b6dbdbc3-1bda-45fc-8e16-c8011b8ef105
X-Archives-Hash: 839c2b88898ed4539ed3fadb37a71d06

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Gentoo's singling itself itself out as less receptive to its users
>> simply because some its developers are too Trumpian to resist arguing
>> with people who criticize their work or Gentoo.
>>
>
> Wouldn't it be a bit exclusionary to require prospective developers to
> be qualified to be heads of state?
>
> I'd think that such a thing would discourage users from contributing.


Qualifications are subjective. For both groups of people.