From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA6081396D0 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCC0A1FC074; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9097A1FC03E for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id r199so21363644vke.4 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 07:55:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nIIqdIQsxqRJTdu2eNRgWPOhwVr+qZooKKY9w2qhav4=; b=dx+ily8OvE3M1I7mS+Q1UhBDYbWFlftefUjCYyR43+rXvrmx7djGKaGOMiUDTx+E1Q Hw018LTF7XLZEH2hdk+SiUwOUnhF6GyeMHDz7NQ8TwNcUeDNx/ZlO5IZw98tDTNrxBN1 d0I4zyBY84Q6XgbhOJsp+rT79bKRUSWu0TIHALV6YRddLufOTwqNL4e5ZqAzc+3TQmnH i7pZ6T5qll3RVBCFc9jTFuhbBlas+wFTj6GJx1ObMCCx78lNvK6exeOxYLH0+lSQJBco p3sploiFwaiIpwUkcJguPprfNElVOvwPGVGNefNiXwiyWnfirRq5EDWGzrsHt9wPDtVy wOkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=nIIqdIQsxqRJTdu2eNRgWPOhwVr+qZooKKY9w2qhav4=; b=Yjsqfck32q/3Rtf1SqB/awhe4ea+2okfFEA8rpLk7g6glAZoi8d4a6T5Est0yzv4CD kq7/7ZAlYAiEOt4zrcGnJpdKTmTUEDdLi+tD80bTPkRbWeJnLDmp4eHhcPg0TEPpcE+H 1XTOe1k2446AO258LzRaEX6jMO7WH+q7YHGFuM0soD5S+gTw+DprebNhxP5Hw48Vl25v nLXEOouCyIUY4vS9iV/T97Lul8VYoJ1J+L9pWrLNnf0h/ec/2pyMcD/3Bv2uDGBgsmWf WoipLePn736avTXLea19S35B41Fl8YdeTRSNHxWjEYysx27HTe9OasNZRfws0SdI6neh rHxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5ig4NpEJd/g2MnLy3tSOPxu7jP+rddOtTMdM+B0+feXiNtGWlb3 VMl9jInow7WOmO9lB9WPc3kfqU/wx3xl X-Received: by 10.31.161.8 with SMTP id k8mr10586333vke.78.1502549742529; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 07:55:42 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.86.207 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 07:55:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <36fd7740-c0c9-5957-0e6b-38b5fd50bba0@gentoo.org> References: <36fd7740-c0c9-5957-0e6b-38b5fd50bba0@gentoo.org> From: Gordon Pettey Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 09:55:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11440030a9352305568f9fc3" X-Archives-Salt: 2f5700cb-86e8-424d-9db5-de7875bed1fa X-Archives-Hash: 069633eddbd900630d51429cb3a92565 --001a11440030a9352305568f9fc3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's still a > good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to see the > proposed change, and view it as a bad sign for Gentoo. > Also, how many Portages are there that need to be managed with a "Portage Manager"? --001a11440030a9352305568f9fc3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= at, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@gentoo.org= > wrote:
While the PMS perhaps = hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's still a
good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to see the
proposed change, and view it as a bad sign for Gentoo.

Also, how= many Portages are there that need to be managed with a "Portage Manag= er"?

--001a11440030a9352305568f9fc3--