From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 294671396D0 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E04BBE0C9A; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-x241.google.com (mail-ua0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 994B3E0BCB for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-x241.google.com with SMTP id q13so313539uaf.3 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:39:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2kpEWeqgiNRdLaULJQm/UNV/cQGIhKXb2rUXDkJB7ao=; b=WN7Tywv7j0oTEBcul1sRBxYg6+oSNrs2cdC4rQTwEiuScOF5VcIzPxHtuG/OVwYcmu 74zC9yEJze+kMywr2ldZH1A8AKRkZQjCE6FKRkmMabcrtoMd+KTMxGzNjcesDhBBlJ1W 2tqTkCBVtSy6jqrfOJoFuSAf+RcyR1BYIxW2snpUgJYWy/4XvBkTWyueds2BECJJjTr3 FABeoV3is4+yrWr+WS9r6LG2S0GXKD8qjj/YQCX35Wtqeqbtm7DVuEnuohpibt+WnhIW Af1t7vOydxdSCKZN66gAtuRt80tyVfv1W1DjtUxQhYwvoZDpMP2mHSb0VDYp+Wi+N4vE yuKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=2kpEWeqgiNRdLaULJQm/UNV/cQGIhKXb2rUXDkJB7ao=; b=Bj00SF6+XJiJ3qxSTE7zqICMpI/Mu/tCPLqClw1w4xDkg/2Np5g/I3zfAN1nV6Lr28 d5vqEYu5FmrfnDtHtWZ0VMREXnbXbow6WOmYicL4QebrS5iELFmGP759x4OmDc6VRnT6 Zu4Jqzg+jh9hDhmwWVwUaobiGYDyl332CrrRXYwJJs08kaXtCKbBlsP7EsQ5sm5zww75 8fiwUZncwaiXLRiXWxcchk9qHNOD1e+7rwqey8ZVPgjVPhUq3AAhyLZ+sAmryvNB9niV RMu8D3gP9MWcU1ilkrJG4aUAt7Oxqjx+xWJTD1zoGN8N9xfm6yPwTH+Uo7/zZHUaj8hj nwPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5hA8dc++WPWt7GnPd45ljvXpbU9w2YDBe4cVWSaxZtwK7Wq2g8L 3Pizu5wgnc45uSYY4PcnyLRJbfQO/cXC X-Received: by 10.159.54.197 with SMTP id p63mr19541862uap.136.1502750345600; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.86.207 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:38:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <36fd7740-c0c9-5957-0e6b-38b5fd50bba0@gentoo.org> From: Gordon Pettey Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 17:38:25 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c048b648923820556be5465" X-Archives-Salt: df5eb150-3491-42db-af54-4812f2534cee X-Archives-Hash: 771f48e13de8b0227c10388cd5a505f4 --94eb2c048b648923820556be5465 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:46 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 09:55:02 -0500 > Gordon Pettey wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Alexander Berntsen > > wrote: > > > > > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's > > > still a good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to > > > see the proposed change, and view it as a bad sign for Gentoo. > > > > > > > Also, how many Portages are there that need to be managed with a > > "Portage Manager"? > > If your asking about alternative package managers, I am aware of 2 > I'm not. I'm pointing out that just changing the meaning of P in PMS to Portage makes the acronym nonsense unless you remove or change the M too. --94eb2c048b648923820556be5465 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On M= on, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:46 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. <<= a href=3D"mailto:wlt-ml@o-sinc.com" target=3D"_blank">wlt-ml@o-sinc.com= > wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 09= :55:02 -0500
Gordon Pettey <petteyg359@gmail.= com> wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Alexander Berntsen
> <bernalex@gentoo.org>= wrote:
>
> > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it&= #39;s
> > still a good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to=
> > see the proposed change, and view it as a bad sign for Gentoo. > >
>
> Also, how many Portages are there that need to be managed with = a
> "Portage Manager"?

If your asking about alternative package managers, I am aware of 2

I'm not. I'm pointing out that just cha= nging the meaning of P in PMS to Portage makes the acronym nonsense unless = you remove or change the M too.
--94eb2c048b648923820556be5465--