From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SMwTM-0007wT-R1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:17:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE6EDE078C; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1F1E076B for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjm2 with SMTP id jm2so1360371bkc.40 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:16:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MlsnDDtYABArTKarY/nJaLm8W+WsIKDKqpfEDUEz6VY=; b=KpEZ2SFC/V4hUgoclhCclYf9oxb1IygvA4H6/oei0/d+O9/rq+R38t3G04khZqdahi aDyLgHLivPq4FZp7z8QsZsQz4Eofd1lOrRWBz7DUTwqeBnrsk/L3BRjRnP5chvguJ4E8 DXDzGwOPdwKm51OMlhg4vcCSQAM0043puiWMVeWf5ZsPnh+BZx6ezuKvWOt3+kkFvc1w d5DMs5S7+NFotoMnQWm5TgKvGraw9rtAt6w0StzJIQq7I/ti1dHzEpuTvDxWfTTxI+mt 88OwPWFsGIjxJH6kJC8dy6IVDmhgoMvlV3FMJgAMM/iAkMxLTkpNiEkZKBoIUcct0Cyg 2mhA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.131.84 with SMTP id w20mr486254bks.65.1335338165485; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:16:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.82.129 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:16:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120424183826.499652b0@pomiocik.lan> References: <20120424130959.GB13543@falgoret> <20120424183826.499652b0@pomiocik.lan> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:16:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors From: Corentin Chary To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: robbat2@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: e03d87eb-dbaf-4d16-bd7a-08e4567f17cf X-Archives-Hash: df1d632a53770ef84f42990846aae26d On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny = wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:19:11 +0000 > "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:50:49PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: >> > >> $ ./mirrors.py --all --count >> > >> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net >> > >> 297 ?? ?? http://pear.php.net/get >> > >> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net >> > >> 88 ?? ?? ??http://pecl.php.net/get >> > > These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll >> > > get the closest mirror for downloading. >> > And since there is already ~10 "mirrors" with only one actual >> > backend, should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what >> > about this pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ? >> I think we should add the pseudo-mirrors, but explicitly mark them as >> such in the file, so that they don't get duplicate entries added (eg >> adding us.pear, de.pear and the pear bouncer is bad. Should have just >> the bouncer). > > It'd be great if we could add some kind of additional mirror entries, > which would be used by repoman to signal missing mirror:// entries but > won't be used for downloads. Yep, we could put that in it too: github http://github.com/downloads/ https://github.com/downloads/ nongnu http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/ (I'm not really sure for nongnu). --=20 Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net