From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-51124-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1SMh5z-0005BP-VE
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:52:00 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BF37E0CBB;
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:51:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521CDE0C74
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:50:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkcjm2 with SMTP id jm2so689894bkc.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=B49xhRJHHHSz6JnY8PepizVwlCoZhv6mbdGrBflyvDw=;
b=cuTwZGPYNsjQi3bcEGIqwmL1bbWiF9Q66KqtDMWk7S+uJZ+DZF0JpX8U6+z+TFcF5H
wS4mW5HoCxD1Lhq8jNfAgk5lxiBV4PrBPQQPWu+X1dGZORDDwFwJjUMg0+aKpMHxhtox
95X+gM6042zV9lZ845rLORT5vrFQQc5G8tAW2jE4qMXRK+sPK6wFO/4qNsqsXGvY10zq
47XUqumiCS4/cczOnJf2O/Vcnl1tDFqPbKI1KbxmvhbPCDiG/MbHgyL4QakkopKCw3jb
+utSGBjwSFOr25+J+VTlpRPz4VKQ4a5wmM/7pFIwQDhnrJMNIfRxlqSUGIBhg+MPcpwZ
ycsg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.132.86 with SMTP id a22mr5890922bkt.4.1335279049437; Tue,
24 Apr 2012 07:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.205.82.129 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <robbat2-20120424T143404-361014835Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
References: <20120424130959.GB13543@falgoret>
<robbat2-20120424T143404-361014835Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:50:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHR064i1shzDZkds6_KMC5NztQhfKwXANibjjq_HgZyfU8HihQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors
From: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 6c433f58-8de9-4d22-96fe-15dc887b722c
X-Archives-Hash: d393e331d669ee4f50784e06e31d7511
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrot=
e:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:10:00PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> As part of my portage-janitor scripts (https://github.com/iksaif/portage=
-janitor)
>> I created a tool that counts URIs prefixes and sort them.
>> Here is the result of this script on the gentoo-x86 tree:
>>
>> $ ./mirrors.py --all --count
>> 297 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://pear.php.net
>> 297 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://pear.php.net/get
>> 88 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://pecl.php.net
>> 88 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://pecl.php.net/get
> These are already mirror bouncers. If you visit the above, you'll get
> the closest mirror for downloading.
And since there is already ~10 "mirrors" with only one actual backend,
should they go to thirdpartymirrors or not ? If not, what about this
pseudo-mirrors already present in thirdpartymirrors ?
--=20
Corentin Chary
http://xf.iksaif.net