From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B416A1381F3 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 07:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49A2B21C00F; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 07:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A2E521C005 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 07:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: thev00d00) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE77033D9BA for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 07:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f53.google.com with SMTP id j5so1420402bkw.40 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 23:43:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=qUNWBWDxsj0+ydWA/LN6SEEuXlSB8hYI2V70UBZt87A=; b=LC2I3e/M66m2ITyrEDRfsakHPvnH6qfSn+18bSuSFxgr1r51JtprSNe5RP4EfG7DW+ CmvOIqIp4DRc60BFtyc/2miwfApp+xJmxEivkD4ZqbOKUlqO+TkfRuCkBlTVvDmEh2jU eseGx9gabsj4nXrlC1mv8LVTDiHctHPoI3V0t7riNosHV5xmySRiS7Xq3AB3VnO5KkMo 2kDHj+dkTPtjf3wsVXtScg/szGB870MIvoq+C8f12aLODNyTBUeAe7D55mbH9+5l8lln 4Gm7p5PvpoLJ7jd1YGHAVNG4CYyzvn147Ap9Honz79nsArrVxDLae9K2NtdEuTIf1V2d tD4g== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.146.1 with SMTP id f1mr3787415bkv.130.1354607037874; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 23:43:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.49.14 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 23:43:57 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [89.206.133.53] Received: by 10.204.49.14 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 23:43:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50BB71DD.4080308@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 07:43:57 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] introduce a soft-limit policy for changing other developers ebuilds From: Ian Whyman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175d079c4d83ae04d002070d X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmxnkhJKByUMYbvPP1ZnPG9WHep/21Z9Gbyz0Nm0QqAii99zTPDZ64qKXt6FTBXwLVam8mi X-Archives-Salt: 2dffcb72-ca55-4966-8552-af13eda35f01 X-Archives-Hash: 7e78191ddf56afcb0fb20b0ce309d636 --0015175d079c4d83ae04d002070d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > In my opinion we should limit the amount of places where we document policies and best practices. I suggest we keep only devmanual and PMS as authoritative documents. > > In that case we should go forward and add these kind of policies to the devmanual. +1 from me --0015175d079c4d83ae04d002070d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

> In my opinion we should limit the amount of places where we document policies and best practices. I suggest we keep only devmanual and PMS as authoritative documents.
>
> In that case we should go forward and add these kind of policies to the devmanual.

+1 from me

--0015175d079c4d83ae04d002070d--