From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13911392EF for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4467E09B1; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:52:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f177.google.com (mail-vc0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD9BDE0914 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hy4so5613860vcb.8 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 13:52:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=rcvdNocotVcULWwjPjXqcL3Rh3MhMg9IaK3CSbBYncA=; b=IhFFZyUV4gU5FE3GSl6WDEbscPErqjlw+q5y2ZdtexG/5ekYWwjy/5U9BZCmplqwNL Ea/0kAdimEYW0UXPpZ4RSA6n7K6NdcBdTYP/n/VTEHMt/AsUZrwhwW6x75+b4CW8d0xa /IQjCtOK+FyVrf/QYeuJz1sHS3PGKEB7R3+RVBVJu4Of6c7fPZO5XjwTCCtRuN1Sg3R/ YPz6cxTImI+UU3aOJLwMr/nRnJNtzKQyxYSM+g04GlMK8MizRDiartvKEnEhgvbPDjIo qd0F0JmpWN+8JJXu/HnelvwZKpQb3adP16PhCTnGCeuZboZ1xB75vS2b/xeE4S1YGzE6 1ATw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.158.198 with SMTP id ww6mr36271517vdb.17.1405630377979; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 13:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.72.19 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 13:52:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140717214430.19eab947@googlemail.com> References: <1405600131.895.14.camel@gentoo.org> <53C7D916.2040709@gentoo.org> <20140717170350.5be87e4e@googlemail.com> <1405621727.19699.2.camel@gentoo.org> <53C81C5A.7000202@gentoo.org> <20140717214430.19eab947@googlemail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:52:57 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3leBH2UQfNPWq_UlWaeMxu2SfZY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Prevent to need to change all keywords at the same time From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 7f0ebdfd-05ab-454a-b144-a3876cce8058 X-Archives-Hash: 69d55f598529ddf555a81e5d44a2daba On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:40:02 -0400 > Rich Freeman wrote: >> I agree that it isn't a PMS issue - it is a tree quality issue. PMS >> doesn't prohibit introducing packages straight to stable, dropping >> stable packages, etc. These are all tree quality issues and a matter >> of policy. > > The PMS issue is what exactly happens if two eclasses and an ebuild all > set KEYWORDS. (With current EAPIs, there's no merging done.) > Thanks. I'm still not hearing a really good reason for doing things this way. I'm all ears if somebody has one. Otherwise, right now this sounds like a debate about how we should ban this practice, and not whether we should ban it. But, the Council can decide all around. Rich