From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893F1138A6C for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5381BE0A52; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com (mail-ie0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 617E9E08C5 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:36:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so102391178ied.1 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 07:35:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=6GwIWAi9r1pNUmiA8EMDjmGL6Y8n8+d+uusk4Rhhtbc=; b=K3QNWyuiwh+4ne90kuJJj4V/fsNZq28YnaXNbQNeacARlTHLzmlTb5/pICu7FtSe4I BmOslqMOi/83Q7/BlfHwpG1lvdWVKV842FRdT2MbBaJhthWdrIkbFSIEvxpyoo1etGrT bO8bc2rruWL4Zfxg6/X8jVUBFa266o5SkpAx40mkHE6PNCIsDorudsscnP5HRK7NSK/t tcCojGYs2kuiW2bptrjc9snDbe36XwEEh7pa6j1BScuLk0YrqHgcDhAekCx2oThm4kIh F0W4fNSihj2UwMWFDKqAGBHrpW07NtcsSy5SPykbFA/vYUwxqBZU0LixptbT3ZnWhST7 FaPg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.163.129 with SMTP id mo1mr9153245icc.61.1429367759700; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 07:35:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.48.66 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 07:35:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55325614.4060506@gentoo.org> References: <552A625D.7030000@seismic.de> <1428844100.2041.166.camel@gentoo.org> <552A80E9.1010103@seismic.de> <201504121705.13255.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <552DDC18.3050304@seismic.de> <20150415130214.18559.qmail@stuge.se> <5530E162.2010409@gentoo.org> <20150417140030.2a4dc50e53bbebc8a77edef7@gentoo.org> <5530EB29.9030205@gentoo.org> <20150417152653.20f25fd7e411f7e2cc59f51b@gentoo.org> <55310178.2090404@gentoo.org> <20150417173349.2b4eef4151a3e45719be2bd5@gentoo.org> <55311BA1.4050906@gentoo.org> <553220CC.3050104@gentoo.org> <55325614.4060506@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 10:35:59 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MYTGwMRMHNREmhG9DRX77mMAXhw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Becoming a Gentoo developer? From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: b29e12ed-38ad-449f-a88c-c7b53cb27807 X-Archives-Hash: 5a41e1ae7539577184f152bffa774d54 On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:03 AM, hasufell wrote: > > Having a proper review workflow/platform increases the contribution > factor of the community. And not just that. Define "contribution factor." If you mean the number of people writing patches vs the number of people with commit access, I'll agree. If you mean the absolute commit rate to the repository, I'd say that I have no reason to think that this is true. > > I'm also not going to give real-world examples of such workflows in big > projects: just head over to github. > We already have the same workflow in Gentoo. Anybody can submit a pull request to the git mirror of the main tree. It will get reviewed and committed. We just don't exclude direct commits. -- Rich