From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-50934-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SI3lH-0006lQ-29
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:03:27 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15F79E0AD7;
	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:02:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B255E0E8B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:01:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4so1137810bkw.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=vNh4vDr5zuSpSVr090QWu0xqcIL0VGEa9aBDvtljUuE=;
        b=lNhDPqLPiAspd6o+RxniXzwKVa4FNppS+yloCNgqQieGzSs52Jxu1H0btN4uDVk9Ba
         OYcU3X/GtN7tKNwnjeaqfBEYOifx7QLDGdT7Ul3Fzg53kHCE3IPo7vRMm9H4YUFYqpYo
         s3zi08xKymgzVt7PUf4xEocQE+AMhNUW+vIT+P0bVovrRb/YGD8vElysEoS4JCRE9dJV
         JhGdB6rq9A9nB2GeG2ZV3I2IDP2nCS79EgKtcnoT4uQFtnt4srHqQl7fVX5nCvhS5LD+
         KlCVYoWatyBUBW80dIs4qDmYIYfqbrGynf838nd1ZekIK1TxRH7PnPd55WbXO0g9Fk9U
         5kNw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.152.92 with SMTP id f28mr976443bkw.113.1334174483292; Wed,
 11 Apr 2012 13:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.204.226.77 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120411195345.GA19071@linux1>
References: <20120411195345.GA19071@linux1>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:01:23 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: XyDR028ot9D-YL5zQd3-Mf1-rZU
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_ngz6KLc9SPHRXPgpMYmmVZWXdhmKycqMKyf4_3r+W=pw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] >= udev-182 tracker
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 7765d13a-a82a-4b34-9767-8c2b6f103c43
X-Archives-Hash: 3ac455bca0d85f5b09b842a58b52bedb

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote:
> To allay any fears of that happening, I have opened a tracker [1] for
> issues which need to be resolved before newer udevs can go stable.
>

Probably wouldn't hurt for the initramfs maintainers to open a
stablization tracking bug for whatever version they think will best
address the /usr mounting issue and make them blockers.

Rich