From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F4AE13832E for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FD2D21C205; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt0-f196.google.com (mail-qt0-f196.google.com [209.85.216.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46F3B21C202 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f196.google.com with SMTP id c52so2119025qte.1 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:40:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=M2RhERsH/3R/5WVxfQ4qJoz2v7WmlFwPKkM83y24pEo=; b=MJ2+MiMtz5ZTeFhT8Owq9dwv0Q04dMJrbAdHEfcyIt7OyZFFF+VHvSc6DIuQTq3/U1 UlRkEFGTG6t4RuN6SvsATZVin2qT6SBCAUOlB9J8ddFTMJaGKQJ8rxV70AS4jfa7qEby hfp+MMTcVO7svpxNnerDHTetZYXgu2gcxzY+rjPN9ix36DQhseOkjwC+sQJHc7j/jW3E 8H9MOn6xcP/2/VewxxjHLFKmD4v2li4pCo6gocdk/+XcFQ3WY3pETscG1If6U1ouZ2H+ kFcUhc0B0R7I4YzGm3EOp0b7hdA5L5gMf/obPX3NnLXgTyPh0OZndIHAfBUjuHDYqv9g jRIg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=M2RhERsH/3R/5WVxfQ4qJoz2v7WmlFwPKkM83y24pEo=; b=BS9S88bYP2a/YTV/ikSQQscirX0dN3qMD7w3y+aOL4ljQ3c8kLElFtFwG3kWUzGVrZ +v3PaAbtH4xtanDSt0J1Jlnh30soronIaphAu97p+vQ2lSXXJ2i/quBwabwF27H8yoRV DHSr5ZsJwW1V2uv2X8sPREh2lTSLZCwQibOCGo9fAl0yAQeBdFVfD+7WjmVCgJx9p0LA qe68V7MVehznWk0BXuZ2Q1dL3k2hQVR5LQSkC8XW3zuSdTT/xThKrGZwGqlvW75eLJW+ /KUljpAzsOpOz4MlJlIpwufhs+UGmSmvqaHH95MPoAwdWgllhW3j6O/3TAl2qT3BOKmW 8CvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvBSajmbqkN4SCuuPq5o+1irmjn5q9E6o8C1UjMb7lZicSTIcjSc+KSq81+hb6BNAa5mTo9FxnbgcPVRA== X-Received: by 10.237.47.225 with SMTP id m88mr33131568qtd.106.1471268440370; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.40.36 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:40:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160815005550.0b74972f.dolsen@gentoo.org> References: <6046d13b-1a54-aa5e-ab16-df448b0f8c59@gentoo.org> <20160815034522.GB22106@meriadoc.perfinion.com> <20160815155326.41c9c33d@katipo2.lan> <20160815040543.GA32659@meriadoc.perfinion.com> <20160815005550.0b74972f.dolsen@gentoo.org> From: Rich Freeman Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:40:39 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: h7QMukhGgn4-YrRdAYammUw8PJo Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 7464cd17-e2e4-4743-b1a3-43adc860d81a X-Archives-Hash: 13e157a2e399878e7800a27ecc25b28a On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > I have some trouble with not being able to close bugs as resolved when > the fixes have been released. But I do see that the majority of what is > being discussed relates to pkg ebuilds more than it does to coding > projects. In that sense it sounds reasonable. But for me, most of my > work is project coding, so it overlaps with making releases which > involves the ebuild. As a project coder, I want to be able to close a > bug when a release has been made that contains the fix. In some cases > that release might not get stabilized, but another one later does. > I'd suggest that we agree early-on that the scope of this is around ebuild work. Not "upstream" work where the upstream is Gentoo. Of course, there could be overlap. portage-1.23.ebuild might have a bug, and that gets fixed in the portage dev git, and later gets released to portage-1.24, and then ends up in stable sometime later. Those could be two separate bugs (the gentoo repo ebuild bug vs the portage "upstream" bug), but I'm not sure that makes life easier. If they were two separate bugs (as they would be if Gentoo weren't the upstream) then the scope of this effort is focused on the Gentoo ebuild repo bug. -- Rich