From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A6C1392EF for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 16:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5F39E083E; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 16:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f179.google.com (mail-vc0-f179.google.com [209.85.220.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6BDFE0839 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 16:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id id10so2538575vcb.38 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:42:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=hVZj47va77eUxsAstDG4ILRZqO1HiYNRl2YbM5etbFU=; b=oSt5FyseUySl8DnHVsCi1nSSm6Wy+ciFK/79IJCFt5aejk/6t2MshLztGF5Y2v/oFs KcgUQvfx7xuxq4JncntsiBKoNMPtCBhcKkSdfG0zB8iAQcADbyD3ISzcA7xjp8RNak/E MZtc6kXikFey5I1F8pZRzqZPYj0abncQllc+vFYipM33ZiVvow+OtYvlRWuKc/SXDzc/ FuR8i1n3nL9sIikfl+VgOQjkdlbUYUKUfR0EjieyE7QI+BJmHFzKeweknAT9f2Y9Zidt iRhm+U+dG7Q0nqhGQCAS3Ul/mQN+eC80C4nvGOWQXtCBwv1MyQ/FPmHI7GAzVtoGjSdA cerw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.160.72 with SMTP id xi8mr81979veb.36.1405096941929; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:42:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.72.19 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:42:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53C00FC6.4080007@gentoo.org> References: <20140707234502.3009929a@pomiot.lan> <53BC0CCA.4000702@gentoo.org> <8855764.vbinY6mDrK@note> <53BD835E.2020105@gentoo.org> <53C00FC6.4080007@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:42:21 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: HF0-pskBYvnO6gJO7BTV9KwVVHU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The request to abolish games team policy From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 6c225d3f-8688-41ac-ae36-2ea15d4f09cc X-Archives-Hash: 4611c94aac7185321a74bcaefb5418e6 On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:24 PM, hasufell wrote: > > However, basically having only a single person that actively does such > reviews + no official overlay makes it hard for contributors. > Is there still anybody left who wants to actually join the games team? I suggested that somebody step up who was interested in a previous email and did not get any takers. There isn't much point in trying to break the logjam of people joining if nobody wants to join. I don't have a personal interest in joining the team, but if there are people around who want to join the team but don't want to deal with trying to get the team re-organized I don't mind just helping to kick things off. That said, somebody will have to be the lead (and it could be the same as the current lead if the team so decides). So, if you are just shy about posting publicly feel free to email me with your interest in joining the games project and I'll see if I can help mediate a little. Again, this is just personal initiative and my main interest is trying to constitute a games project that runs itself and doesn't need order imposed from above. If I run into strong objections/etc I'll turn it over to the next Council to deal with whether that includes me or not. In the absence of objection, however (and nobody has raised any yet), I don't see any reason that we can't try to add more members to the team. Rich