From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 15:30:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_nYhQn+hOga5-VvZoVMLAog_4_eAtu32GumG+E_jASMnQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53B45B53.7080009@gentoo.org>
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
<zerochaos@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On 07/02/2014 03:07 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>>
>> I don't know how to get from here to there. The problem isn't just
>> constructing an alternative profile tree. We could even have
>> /usr/portage/profiles-r2 and switch between the two on demand. The
>> problem is there's a lot of memory with flags and masks and these only
>> make sense in the context of the current stacking profiles.
>> Disentangling this information and bringing it over to profiles-r2 is
>> going to be work.
>>
> I agree entirely. Right now the mixin style profiles are not supported
> in gentoo _at_all_, and if no one ever works on that, then we will never
> support it. I will work on the first step in a long road, that's all
> I'm talking about here.
I agree. I think getting support in all the tools for multiple
profiles is a good start. Volunteers can then begin working on
profiles that dis-entangle things.
A first step might be to just rip out the desktop/etc categories,
leaving the mess of arch/hardened/kernel/etc. Then we try to keep
peeling back the layers. We don't have to get there in one step, nor
do we have to release anything to the general public before it is
finished.
We might not end up with completely flat profiles - the goal is to end
up in a better place than we are now, and perhaps we can make more
progress later.
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-02 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 15:44 [gentoo-dev] new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins William Hubbs
2014-07-02 17:54 ` Michał Górny
2014-07-02 18:10 ` Rich Freeman
2014-07-02 18:32 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-02 18:35 ` Rich Freeman
2014-07-02 18:41 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2014-07-02 19:07 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-02 19:19 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2014-07-02 19:30 ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2014-07-03 14:55 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-07-03 23:09 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-07-03 23:35 ` Rich Freeman
2014-07-03 6:18 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-07-03 7:00 ` Michael Haubenwallner
2014-07-03 8:47 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-07-03 16:06 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-07-03 8:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2014-07-03 9:01 ` Martin Vaeth
2014-07-03 7:32 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michał Górny
2014-07-03 8:21 ` Joshua Kinard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGfcS_nYhQn+hOga5-VvZoVMLAog_4_eAtu32GumG+E_jASMnQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rich0@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox