From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEEE138B49 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DBFA21C02F; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (mail-ie0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F61621C001 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c12so10218435ieb.20 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:24:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=C0+VS+GlAou601WgktIwwziCSJ0C5XNlRjIzHN0qIeQ=; b=ymKswiZBXjvIXaO9jdFwjwHsUL/4f6AO5zxxe+cpksiCFTkVb3ltXD++tFjmJuS3YN bE/gbRm5Sl3bZBmqtzJuq9D/mruD1dwYkeBVS6Ij0oQj82Aqv/jB+zobamWrphJS9tuk IQbpXGU5revrVMEQ5r95eu5pfM2UOFQTch9EaHuD0C6mY+QHSAsPFVLL+wRFzujCUv5B KPo0RPm+nP9VzLDaN1Kk43gLYjDiqYVlD8vQpEZ1Zi0Ba3J2m80YloOieJ11e3Nyktsm j3YAy4QarGkHrhN2evVg/ArVb2ugeq3LLyAepO1laBV0BP/gzPWL3fJrmY8nRRiLVC31 EQfA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.193.200 with SMTP id hq8mr11557103igc.101.1361388284408; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:24:44 -0800 (PST) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.21.98 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:24:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <51252213.5030908@gentoo.org> References: <511F8D2E.1080006@flameeyes.eu> <511F9A9F.8040206@gentoo.org> <511F9ADE.2050503@flameeyes.eu> <20767.41371.270947.851486@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <5120654B.6050406@gentoo.org> <20768.43798.568305.561675@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <512389BF.9090504@gentoo.org> <5124CCE9.50203@flameeyes.eu> <20130220162802.30963.qmail@stuge.se> <512508C3.4020406@flameeyes.eu> <51252213.5030908@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:24:44 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pQLu89ZGBTTSI3_N_9tDwylUUjw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: linux-firmware From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: dbcca3ff-1a28-4fe8-90c5-8e50e25b2861 X-Archives-Hash: 30ab189b7099d6d114ddf495ea09c4e0 On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wrote: > Rich Freeman schrieb: >> 4. Non-fetchable - do not combine. > > I don't see a reason for fetch restriction, as long as a direct download > link from upstream exists (via gitweb). Agreed. You would only fetch-restrict a file if it wasn't fetchable or redistributable. If that is the empty set, then great. If not, then split them up and fetch-restrict them. Rich