From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SbWZr-0004uv-TJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:40:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A308E0776; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A51EE0788 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjk13 with SMTP id jk13so4030724bkc.40 for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 05:38:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ba0jUX+6R26qQWreXL9TW6ybSV7quP8ZhZ8vOaZecQs=; b=CaDze4B2hOsBEHmVf3RhmmgGpoInYxTU5hH+siQqsDgX4ABqH/sVZV0zeCUy1AZVXQ Gf8N6xciheTbSmSuGUKmTQlu66FB3U4y9zLj4e+QXOdv5fuXL9kMR1FcP4usUonJqJdH RgZ+zKhuaJ0hsfpzRvPKokbwXzd8a/MJcHMSCap5/Cb5kM6W/WmDPazhBC6hQK+iFqlq GIg0nVSQJmq0GXeYV3ZidCrs/wMdhFl4C6p/tnFw6wjYDuUb2JqfD07k+r2lLpeJOsbO mKtzjVUiBj1o4c1dF0G+Uk9GK0DIlFGaHUbSHTuNFUEPRAzZaWJe7ZmHWC4KfwOILO0v fDQg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.149.208 with SMTP id u16mr6795434bkv.81.1338813504546; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 05:38:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.149.211 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 05:38:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:38:24 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LbDsOdjoSrJsaYlY5kfKaTgQYKk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 2 of N: developer interaction (merge co-ordinators) From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 8ba2af67-c7b0-49d3-8c42-124e79d2393c X-Archives-Hash: e6c6534ea5b9ccf261a0062d05567f74 On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > IMO we should try to be cutting down barriers from the git migration, > not throwing up more. The process has taken long enough already; the > desire to control everything about the migration is part of why it's > taken so long. Fair enough. We should also be asking ourselves what happens if something goes really wrong and there are no commits for a whole two days. I think the answer is, not much. As long as there are a few devs who can tend to security issues or whatever I don't see it as an issue if we have the odd glitch. We do need to get the docs up so that we're at least somewhat harmonized on conventions (authors vs committers, and so on). Let's not burn the first person to make a mistake at the stake either... Rich