From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-85879-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EA0F138334
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 21:31:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94E65E0CFD;
	Mon, 10 Sep 2018 21:31:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com (mail-pf1-f194.google.com [209.85.210.194])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3320FE0CD7
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 21:31:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id j8-v6so11113334pff.6
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=a1QrN2hjdjN9RxTWrD5U6ta2U1nmTDvg0VUmPaCfCsI=;
        b=ZGpv8s8LHZTkZDIAm6cg7Ap7Vx6VrF0bT47d96EWMfJct0oC+4sXPYB4IPzmD3BSZp
         kLB8jc8ulfKmgyQzulRdyfBKG6RlveSOEXSx4yqLRjhvi/anF7sa332KHFF5zm3wW4ul
         kQZ8bFnDjSPkpvHIGgZVfdfVCz8Sie1N1JA6cM2O5baPCmvOThPmOhKRy40XLKEyt9nT
         MMjwNOQxNKNv58K1lMk11RE1OJIH9jg7JbxWuErsfXrGoUtmATE42PlnhtKiSzHE5GiM
         CrqKGq4b6/DPYY5O1FDCCl+WjV4EIrG05Vs42N3O2toCEIQyC1XzWJqX+5mvb94BaQRh
         4GpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CLm/S9ecF48EGhYCudsb6F1KbWfBF8PNHc9YfWHzh/4lC+jZf5
	ZSbXWP58LPP68tOq0i5NtgiBK4mS93x6HEEzVo0ZdV4C
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaP+0DEwUSrA7f/sInRIXr47ITsDvB+UzYiFMqY3tQdzAGUVFxx6AEc6LRjroCbjZ4Wl1Y/GFvwR14BXKonJSE=
X-Received: by 2002:a65:5304:: with SMTP id m4-v6mr25122584pgq.250.1536615112673;
 Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180909143221.21d784d02f51623e8c57c545@gentoo.org>
 <1536510660.863.9.camel@gentoo.org> <ff5331b1-eb52-34eb-95f8-9b124019b809@gentoo.org>
 <20180910074539.GA6512@baraddur.perfinion.com> <0d8b7f02-9c38-969c-413b-69d4dee6ca89@gentoo.org>
 <CAEdQ38GfSjoKmn2jZgA-j8dxXESxe_hxu-bovSKgo6yonrR9bQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <32027432-a5d2-9e63-2eac-70e62f52d242@gentoo.org> <CAJ0EP42kD8dPogU8jm9BkFsBfwW0rbyt8_gbBohCAwmcM=9uvg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0EP42kD8dPogU8jm9BkFsBfwW0rbyt8_gbBohCAwmcM=9uvg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:31:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_nMxn+OwcFXVD3HATmj1sa9-_4=O7LOvis4TPir3dtYkw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing policy about -Werror
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Archives-Salt: f92e3585-7954-456f-8a7b-6952d03160ac
X-Archives-Hash: 9795b19487d081c0faff48be1fa4a2ed

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 5:01 PM Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:56 PM Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/10/18 10:51 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > Consider again the bug that started this. The maintainer had not built
> > > this configuration. None of the arch teams had built this
> > > configuration until I did for the last architecture Cc'd. The patch
> > > committed doesn't change anything installed on the system, if not for
> > > Werror preventing the code from building.
> >
> > one way to look at it though, is that it is a valuable upstream
> > contribution that this configuration produces the error, so Gentoo is
> > contributing to upstream development because of it.
>
> As an end user of Gentoo, I may not care about "contributing to
> upstream"; I just want the software to compile and install.
>

For more critical packages (like the example of zfs) whether it
compiles and installs isn't 1/10th as important as whether it eats my
data...

-- 
Rich