From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E280138334 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02BC0E08C0; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pj1-f47.google.com (mail-pj1-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A255E086F for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f47.google.com with SMTP id r67so3135083pjb.0 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 07:25:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Zh3zJ593naUqknGeb2/UIPAvSZYroX1n+CcXTCfA32s=; b=Zi7pkbNr3hwqZBYfOuokU/1vqP9307e2w/MwNmvAFzczFxcp3chd3BPDrsht4xQTuX vPVPAP4htV+3EFDh2m9EnCfwrspEk1kpS5uHYLXw3PexrvBQiZboy6rYy4vwZx7m/fiM 2P70ra0ALt0ZtJD+fsHVU8A0VXrpmDrc2VuNO7qsgqra8hWJ/5ItR/4Z6D7azSVqqrGe XOy/b1+32J7PKExtTez6cGBFqYpib1vsc2yvmhumFL8TPEEn5hmfZB76Ga8JLhPrAAF0 8pT78Exo0epSevfPa6nWmSNcO6qHZx2wW6U3xvrfFLuLiYp/FPCWdr22lt53fanLZMym ryqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWCnKDkeRbDS5fRgieVfANSVoeEMlkFjLJgKhak0hEJP8VC/k4Q JGZ563RpjyA/a801gLTqz/qS6T6htWT5QkKV5dzJvA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyx0CdZ58qeZNa/aCBWJeE153UhvUcPny1VpJWLisrBT0JS70ZZpj0vK+UbYqFKYnD7JcsoXNWk9447FRzzF00= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:3d0d:: with SMTP id h13mr18328407pjc.1.1576509905797; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 07:25:05 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <293656848f42786552da59ad307058d597efa026.camel@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: From: Rich Freeman Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:24:53 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [EAPI 8 RFC] Selective fetch/mirror (un-)restriction To: gentoo-dev Cc: Francesco Riosa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: 3e00ab04-bb94-4145-bccb-12a5b5968517 X-Archives-Hash: e6b6f8e29a3a11c5a0b1f74bb6db1737 On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 8:33 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Francesco Riosa wrote: > > > what about getting rid of RESTRICT="fetch" and manage everything > > inside SRC_URI? Would that be technically feasible? Ideally marking > > only the not re-distributable download and leaving untouched the > > others > > That would have the disadvantage that mirror and bindist restrictions > (which are strongly correlated) would be listed in different places. An obvious way to address that is to also move the mirror restriction into SRC_URI, so that they are both exclusively in this location as well. I believe those are the only two redistribution-oriented options for RESTRICT currently. -- Rich