From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14EC1382BD for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7D9CE09BC; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f54.google.com (mail-vk0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5793E09AF for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j2so116363345vkg.2 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:48:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=EYe5/0hQmNzaUOd0fqngtcoG3eIQTXWpQEAnw9HO8mk=; b=X1da2BTbRys63LEsb2PAaSYan4vAmYBCSuL/EEgwu0LsWehOg8DrC9mFM5qpkAP/Qr zu1onBYLO+uO5z2bdyDtBWBXpzIpSCjqWj+4d22xwpWzcFJGkUN4JvIreV/jCq7qmp5O z1jF6EdpbQDKaHKW10kZLL4mKd4QtvuaETdO6lf/94hoOd7a0fdhjUee+LtrsW/0yom6 rRRAOjMaw/QPzUlx/QyT0EZfrsBFAaofMV/UX5GOfPtYS6/kajd14TJMqu8zBqlzkO2t dy1r9kX06frEXzO1epnEkn6yqkseRTECb+fDfPMxdJFK197K49wawLBNYWn1yJEaKcsj VlXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=EYe5/0hQmNzaUOd0fqngtcoG3eIQTXWpQEAnw9HO8mk=; b=DpS4dMx3BXUwBryGccHbyn+n3FV5gZ9KJqqo5zceFBp4RiC9oHC8CcH8szayn8dhgw WwE5+9VAWakwjBREANdFuRfN73gbL/O+5Ia4EoCyc4Y8FYg0oMuqn/NNN/mHQnljrWZQ JPrk/G5JYbksDs3NG27+d5fiaMb1YilGAgZeQH3RvCwfewGhBa2FNsjVzQo0U4eH8tHg eDs9zBbQyfiCknl0zx3QKDG6dLh0OJwRJQ0eVXOyHy62jmUVF5B5J8gIQMDtSMef//8b +LNT0Yj5ZkzBB8ZY2kSrJ8l9m104AA9u4dhqX9QvawcmuuWGNS+jSyswA3fVM9/V7LvL vCqA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLYiLaWd1qOs+PGORjKnamHEyEJpHCPEWkZQUMXmfELhkMviTdq8sb19nrisE1Smh6UeYfKlK7l7F0SZQ== X-Received: by 10.31.52.69 with SMTP id b66mr909556vka.16.1466171302959; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:48:22 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.70.155 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:48:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <506a04f7-cedd-7ea3-5b45-dc974a9c567d@gentoo.org> References: <20160616150213.47f09bc4.mgorny@gentoo.org> <201606162357.12178.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <5763A8B2.2010907@gentoo.org> <3ca26a9a-4738-1c46-9f4f-6507b0919d50@gentoo.org> <506a04f7-cedd-7ea3-5b45-dc974a9c567d@gentoo.org> From: Rich Freeman Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:48:22 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: H8hJO63VAT_0FPCb92uMdoji818 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Killing VERIFIED state, possibly introducing STABILIZED To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: adf71667-2766-4e8a-909d-1b1542194518 X-Archives-Hash: db94dcf5f13201ebd83ffffdde6e0619 On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 06/17/2016 02:18 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> If I'm a maintainer and I resolve a bug, how do I know if I should >> mark it resolved or not before it is stable? > > If package is in stable to begin with, I would certainly prefer it not > to be marked fixed before it is in stable in all cases to avoid that > ambiguity. keywords are useful for search and filtering > That would of course work. The question is whether we're willing to live with that. It would mean that most bugs would stay open a lot longer than they do today. Also, in the case of STABLEREQs would we treat them more like security bugs - the last arch would just post a comment that all archs are stable and un-CC themselves, but leave the bug open to remind the maintainer to go check all open bugs to see if any should be marked fixed? -- Rich