From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-79353-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7708139085
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 21:23:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66856254038;
Fri, 27 Jan 2017 21:23:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yb0-x233.google.com (mail-yb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::233])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C79325402E
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 21:23:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb0-x233.google.com with SMTP id j82so71644977ybg.1
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:23:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to;
bh=TXD9/M5OEtEWHNCMBijPaEvwMSeX9vAOUXQU67WbsQQ=;
b=XRJzsufdP3WXU3ObsZBID9+6FLvtnuBjfMIF7Jrr4l5E8TuEnGn7sd8AJhZHzoOmM5
T/oPN3dlnoElyBuN9duGZx69B/4oSm83lTtDkB/MHRrDjNgcS5PhgfFEo/6bHTEYm84m
71hTUevEzwXBBIAy4VXkfnvzjCkHNzNi59pQIrTWhInOvaIlNsxL9oBrsCd5Z29LDW+W
FTJUC29NWRw51WSzlUyzAnnIlK2syOZfhaZpm/WmtiMGGg8aDh9nOZlwG4tjVJOmj4gC
17M+GAiLzNsBnp84CpJPnt+AHnYiLjHfV2AF86TvwukLVfSPH3gZBxmCjnJz8WbuXg8J
L00Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=TXD9/M5OEtEWHNCMBijPaEvwMSeX9vAOUXQU67WbsQQ=;
b=em4LlFAHo9oXq/X/0JlIcwQODaDvn+KGL3lOAAIQiRmpfqQ7rmiUyISs31Oh0wy8/p
kkePGr0hdrjTGbM7013yFU7601wMP53U8rD2jiTAbeLrDQAdKPoOudGF5pJjnWhqIKDM
X9Q8msHFLuIVPZVx5Wdy6B+y9vph19RNsHqrOWAiwq01Mgm4iNjAtFpn5a9/dPXixzra
tp6olvg8//qaM/ijbwJGujdkfPGDQaG/M32X6ELVC8ry1rYdMbnfMHJbofWD9xkQneg6
6bqxXIpfaTGIus20VWhFpDrrjLnv1WFkVkOpiDlJlk6m38RvGbzW48R5vSOxFzvDTypr
VO2A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJW2mmSXy4LjGYOfHB/+KLebnqyyrDMy3GH/I+bt8DPmbhjRPuseC/mR9dMMV0Lon2ky5x36/k0ikFyNg==
X-Received: by 10.37.2.135 with SMTP id 129mr3405918ybc.112.1485552182896;
Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:23:02 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.13.239.193 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:23:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <15866eb3-cd3f-8f4d-dd6c-b4e9d6a9bc78@gentoo.org>
References: <9558d41c-17c0-4bbd-e2f8-02575c6d0ecd@gentoo.org>
<CAGfcS_=biacBM0xsy0GX3_X0mOAd3BdgHDXYorSBkmwsoQ9sgQ@mail.gmail.com>
<ee24eb83-4430-40ff-07d0-577bc188457d@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_=V+xmBU+fFbMQBH39E9-y9CUaZt9Bok80Wg6_jboHcbQ@mail.gmail.com>
<15866eb3-cd3f-8f4d-dd6c-b4e9d6a9bc78@gentoo.org>
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 16:23:02 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: WDruxKm7rqiaNteM4kQWUzZhwEM
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_nGpTZqw9FfVDnRR2-BTk+UnuwSSkO_2XOZsmqkDUr5-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Requirements for UID/GID management
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: d56d8d89-a0f0-4934-9dc9-433541ef9fbc
X-Archives-Hash: 8eebb6dbab7e41914619d01890d29ded
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> wrote:
> My first impression is that any package that doesn't care
> about its UID should default to "first available", but if that causes
> problems, then that's exactly the sort of use case I'm looking for.
>
The ones I listed before were filesystems shared by multiple hosts,
such as with nfs, containers, and chroots. Granted, there are ways to
deal with this sort of thing, but if you want to share your /var/www
across a bunch of apache servers it would be nice if they all had the
same UID for apache.
--
Rich