From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-54288-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961A0138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:17:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4876C21C00E;
	Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:16:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FA6E06AF
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:15:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4so827110bkw.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=gjHtxJi6oXuBQimymQtGRVO947oZiG2pOrv9MGfGkSk=;
        b=R2BX7XX2x31Ldn0fUALiTdqq7x7g6qsmidF8Ysjj/lV7DoFlGXq98RWbUbtm54opyU
         z8GDu9XtpXL5cN982+jmTbRknS4QkD7nYw/4f7OpgGbORknwLyrJZ6RWB29kJkYa+5HE
         8UoKxjE67LEb8L2pGKAVuGMNorIT3PmH/GfTzxzKDeneskJO18+PSJL/qTwSrqx1Q+ea
         WeRaWExuAd+STvxLGmhEDleUGGKR/C1JUvhPsEXc0J1V3cl5RGUhR/c5C+s/Wgg0QSf0
         9MtvuXRrIFlGuGAY39q4nv81/wnZmvB7B1e4MnwvIDM6cvtuul9eIxYyjYpqkquQ7nXU
         LSUA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.154.214 with SMTP id p22mr2806170bkw.111.1346332542799;
 Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.204.14.76 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <503F657F.5040109@gentoo.org>
References: <1650487.RNHkTcOSMI@elia>
	<CAGfcS_=jwKDZzMzAdHX0vt2kZi-_LKhnwW_UuPZDm8593tgeMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1941775.YCGWEdgpfQ@elia>
	<CA+czFiDVnW-Q5H=afTouCJmYNTcfZ3d7Kp78J9BPupeRG46-Hg@mail.gmail.com>
	<503F6358.4030403@gentoo.org>
	<CAGfcS_nLQudumPm4+yHuX1A0ruZBGUvR-dPrX69gyBBPCAnnSg@mail.gmail.com>
	<503F657F.5040109@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:15:42 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4lLJichLrZ1-yRMESoAo0GVmQYE
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_n96zyZ0BNGLmf0VftNcNhB=fEg+1XC9_WXU_Pr=avxPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI usage
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 808420d9-206d-413d-b3af-7aa2dfcdf76c
X-Archives-Hash: 71b5f871fb66a128aef8b33dd0e37806

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I think you may miss the meaning of "should".  It's not the same as
> "must".

Is it a policy or not?  If it is a policy we can ignore at our own
discretion, then by all means pass it, and we can all do whatever we
like, as we already are.  :)

Rich