From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-57952-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD16F13868C
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:22:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7023421C042;
	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:22:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com (mail-ie0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E95FE0552
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:22:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id k13so145197iea.36
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:22:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=iyM9YKS91gvmHa8lKSyL91g2NrgbjV5s3Ugi8BxU+Ho=;
        b=oHc1YLzjILvy9mkFz7wLftcAHj2A+nNGIS/PUy60s2wwTOfS5yQkdwdimvcImYKybf
         AiOcMadmxeklaJpDcyNliJcvlwMdG83CQEe+fF7k+2FjyZv0XYJnz+xYHtZaUICVx/at
         1ZKWeVWxAc10zY3/oUTEEXIdV61ByZfpQheIhbJox6T0CmcVIelt6j2uqBxnMV0RHh6F
         pkhuLDcjsKwN8LqR7BLv2cwEhI3juHKFTnc5ebREMUFwcrGVl4LkG9YfbGuieVc9zJAO
         4c355YVRGEzcAmIjPbvd7olcR9GyxcJ7t6YnuLvt9SiLs8qFtKel3Q4ugRnJwkkrvP+2
         XqKA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.203.74 with SMTP id ko10mr4672636igc.26.1359141726701;
 Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:22:06 -0800 (PST)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.30.231 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:22:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1359140709.2927.8.camel@belkin4>
References: <1359140709.2927.8.camel@belkin4>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:22:06 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: d1LmvR2dO9leccl9Gu3Nt5Yqsi0
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_n8uO63LBhimGu1j6Jmx21dnYbF0brVTaFeJDMV_Q-K+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Confusing tmpfs information in udev news item
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 5bf0c129-3aa7-4a4d-ae70-3353f1831af7
X-Archives-Hash: 59b874deb42a1fecd3cd1aa084e94d71

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Does it apply to /dev/shm? That is the line I have in my fstab:
> shm             /dev/shm                tmpfs
> nodev,nosuid,noexec     0 0

No.  It applies ONLY to /dev - if you even have a /dev line, and if
you don't that is OK.

Rich