From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3598F1384B4 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 03:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB50A21C04D; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 03:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com (mail-ig0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02154E08AD for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 03:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igvg19 with SMTP id g19so93207380igv.1 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 19:21:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=yBfc36/tJxaCLwixVWD5hQk+TYq/upavygsaJCY/ZoQ=; b=g9xneBDKAAKw6BeVjgHgHGfxoXybS/i+HDgTjlfqOb2DlYk+H8iHnKRmC4yjT7Dokl 6hyvAAo6YgvLYyMENBgLoUyhDU6dn2SEVYhn0NC+mnLOJ6HjWq9afFqS7520ka2nm4ea ZO/kmXXF+b6mU8jBtKXj1wZP7L8WtbiGzH+HG5D1b1Xbu8rtq+zfaYgRCsbBPWA3EVq2 +yIb/LSP3BCNdhAuPr+sxDXOTJh+Qe/9tzre1sivbM+eouOiaBWRwKBVJDj4s82+PUZB WyUaUOT5nLoZbDvZzXcec5l6SXMBrxqe2YWkyuAGPkuvRPui0YsKEA2CfOElN4NkznXF fhBg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.27.38 with SMTP id q6mr18627899igg.70.1449544874933; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 19:21:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.38.210 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:21:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56663E47.20902@gentoo.org> References: <20151206153611.2a132d2c.mgorny@gentoo.org> <56663E47.20902@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 22:21:14 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: iLmXARghOnDLJKfEcp35qf1boaw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: automatically mailing people on pkgcheck problems with their packages From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 11d55d2a-2d9b-4987-b310-f296913e5411 X-Archives-Hash: 87eeb7f72e009d981241fa9ed14ba504 On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > Does that include stuff that breaks on systems using musl instead of > glibc? Or uclibc? or eudev instead of udev. What about openrc vs > systemd? Shall I go on? Of course its murky. Sure, but none of that stuff is going to get caught by the CI system most likely. The scenario was one commit breaks 100 packages, and I guess I read into it that this is in a vanilla profile. I suppose there always is a gray area, but if it is breaking on a default profile I'd consider that something every committer should be concerned with, and that is the sort of thing that the tinderbox is going to catch. In any case, it is just data. As you say emails can be ignored if appropriate. -- Rich