From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5BC1384B4 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F9F721C09D; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com (mail-io0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 354A921C08B for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f171.google.com with SMTP id q126so171441308iof.2 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:45:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=nOuLLiMZkMqovLVLlrcYVaDvveTNw9mpxgyPVM2Vfg4=; b=mJqBiZXKwu4zqxOV0nwUoU9Ey5SAvNsDFfbVsQ6Oa/hpIIKflwqjhqintrOUxjrhhB S2u4nmLJ9r95KOCmEX4tIl0Guiyvf7aP7/oUtpAXGXn6IgpPiUGxwcIFvZhlLpLSZPhQ iY1sLWJ4E7DpEwlQIob7m3Wd6ofEMbbEixrVCtFMCW6P6K/SqVh4E6LJqxru/d/mnmZ5 LgV7pAgNtbahUKclkDAu8691Z777uf6QJ5uNLXjJ90mSinGa8077qmAJkoGUYuRh5cUk eylz5NlcLJ6ZqwhbeQS0H58JzUMk2WzT8u5AQ1ynPhq6RX1RuBdGwSwJA80KZmG0S7kL wdRw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.62.133 with SMTP id l127mr20843294ioa.45.1450745157579; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:45:57 -0800 (PST) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.38.210 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:45:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151221185939.13970.qmail@stuge.se> References: <566DACB3.2010105@gentoo.org> <20151213222001.0c1c466a3f3b8b0b53c69a9d@gentoo.org> <20151213190045.1e186781.dolsen@gentoo.org> <20151220212127.6e5cd419@caribou.gateway.pace.com> <20151221185939.13970.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:45:57 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gtxoZOvLPJLOnhE3oP7TQKu5MZo Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 43561fb4-4894-4d0d-9d0d-565fb0d4e9b0 X-Archives-Hash: f698210e0192773799071090e93c2e5e On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Ryan Hill wrote: >> You want me to use a potentially unstable live ebuild instead? >> Well, no, that's not gonna happen. > > Are you demanding that someone else produces for you, and refusing to > do anything but consume? > Keep in mind that the GLEP does not require anybody to actually use gkeys. It is just a tool intended to make the GLEP easier to follow. As has been pointed out, we haven't exactly been strict about enforcing compliance, and for my part I'm not inclined to see a lot more enforcement until the instructions/tools/etc catch up. If anybody wants to see increased adoption of the new GLEP, I'd recommend focusing more on easy instructions and tools. That said, anybody who cares enough will figure out how to get it working. I just made myself a dedicated tree-signing key and as far as I could tell the last time I looked at it the key complied. Just don't try to send me any encrypted email, since the key in LDAP probably doesn't work for encryption (having a separate LDAP record for signing key and communication key might make sense). :) -- Rich