From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNmtR-000517-Sj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:15:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C361E0769; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A980E090E for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjk13 with SMTP id jk13so653594bkc.40 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:14:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VvxwB7IiNjqCeeYOEO5b5V/WL+mUxqcmsjAEvCla+XU=; b=A4dgrjuEy4PBn4c2svKOp2yLxwuTBEzymgzNlPJ6O0y3m8AY0+/WaqBn22eTlP+JEc VKs6GV2rpqD/t85/pa8dCECuo5y+r9DIscsJ96oDz79dgZm8Zw6OMvINt/LqSgVFbISj LbZ5xNO/5WGoHjvslUFc9pG6usJgocWDXYwifHS/rraUXkQ55iyohWWOWYwqX8GNit62 GFbGe4+MgdgCMjbWXeAQYptMy3nu6GmLuMKSliW9N3uP55ti8N4xMWqJeKguxxGCt3ZA Fg0gltK9OwRwZrQAUgB1la1e6LDne1A3J7vttlqm9/WDC6GuNTT3cHyKP7/Wz1gPeybA sjXg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.152.92 with SMTP id f28mr1276916bkw.113.1335539667334; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.226.77 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:14:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1335519028-sup-4124@raeviah> <1335526185-sup-4610@raeviah> <1335534186-sup-3638@raeviah> <20120427143405.GA20829@linux1> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:14:27 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UPaMaQkvV53F9obuhn5QFxKRzAY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New license: yEd Software License Agreement From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: b57101a8-557c-4a56-91e4-cf0ad0c3601d X-Archives-Hash: 78f47ef8397221acc9253ae8b432df1b On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > Tho FWIW I think restrict=fetch applies to stuff like cd/dvd-based game > data as well, where the agreement is on the cd not a website, but still > requires specific click-thru. I think the real determiner should almost always be whether there is a URL that you can reliably fetch or not. If you're talking about a CD there is nothing to fetch. If you want somebody to copy a file off of a CD and stick it in distfiles then RESTRICT=fetch makes perfect sense, but it has nothing to do with licensing, but the fact that no consistent URL exists. Legally the basic issue is whether linking to something is the same as distributing it. I'm open to a lawyer's summary, but my sense is that the case law around this is very messy, especially on an international scale. Rich