From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-64768-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA6B138CE3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun,  9 Feb 2014 18:46:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C3F8E0B31;
	Sun,  9 Feb 2014 18:46:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ve0-f182.google.com (mail-ve0-f182.google.com [209.85.128.182])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FB23E0B2A
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  9 Feb 2014 18:46:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ve0-f182.google.com with SMTP id jy13so4262076veb.41
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 10:46:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=LTzBrqaJPH55jjn6OkUBCZV8yEGsZRGrFU/ho3DR+f8=;
        b=sUu9nVd3WNkt+J1MOXSiFuv4lKlRxaEVB9hqe0uJaAmmYuI3MGbOTHw4rw8n77JiuD
         DW1wPaxqp6aCvTxcfXiOnaBbv0BRxLuGUQJNa7S6gXZ1jW7WlVI4JhgMb3hv7wJjX4ct
         BfBuFYMQGyJULllZl+D/IeuKfr/l97JyfrsWXaMpY+3ydQioczOpOYsB4oD7NXvxStZT
         lfQzkpdOYKGnMeP2Wu4f446Xbkv3WtZbHSiv+cGDx1ypFIBCxqLgnIbdEOnPRUPvWOAi
         y1XiJEManClRT73CQfgvWeCQxGG3TwI6+YWH4HTq8ACx4QP1OMtzGuguRngLPkjn6mMA
         1zKA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.200.168 with SMTP id jt8mr114821vec.30.1391971599756;
 Sun, 09 Feb 2014 10:46:39 -0800 (PST)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.254.198 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 10:46:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52F7C78E.3080903@gentoo.org>
References: <CADPrc83g_24F=Ww2D+upCTQsQb87mjnbK93D1usdyKnQ9eChYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<52F7C78E.3080903@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 13:46:39 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3JHd2AKQYKPFyXMmhdlZ86XBUHA
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_mpPCnGHQNXPPrZuW9oGiL1bB-aeOrBNsDV4TYGpeAsNA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Thank you
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 78b75bab-3d21-422e-80f3-718be3bfcb99
X-Archives-Hash: a90ee378c10773e9b9877db6d96ce28f

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> wrote:
> as the long as the few interested in it do not interfere with existing
> things, they are free to package it as they see fit.

Can we kindly refrain from starting another systemd flamewar in a
thread whose initial topic was thanking us for not letting the systemd
flamewars get out of hand?

As far as I can see the current compromises seem to be working fairly
well.  There is really no need to start drawing more lines in the
sand.  If at some point supporters of any particular design start
feeling limited by our current policies we can always revisit them.

Rich