From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-81545-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 127F8139694
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 22:46:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 036BA1FC00A;
Tue, 25 Jul 2017 22:46:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yw0-x241.google.com (mail-yw0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::241])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A414E1FC002
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 22:46:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw0-x241.google.com with SMTP id p68so3675425ywg.5
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=P6Z0v9r/qlyNNArrrFqmPTYANdsIl1HTy0hj6Bcuw+M=;
b=nHuIlrpNRnBfucLYN2GgeYgfvKv9x6dBUA1Gi1dXXYMDJQJDvO6Ag6ArVSXtksmSjN
SA1aQM0xs86M1oSB9DuXeKHjcl6F/QR6opGwIyTOTprFemCgvS3GbznCof14QZdOdkFz
96lYGSFUVkAm7VfYiycJYg89Ndf6XqX6SIEWgRIXQfdk88vGIx7Wy9BhpfVX5JMygxgm
B70KTkuIK5gPwcgoidA0L9Sp0TtL9Vlw9qXa9p7GqXQ9b/ktoit7KHRLrKSyNDbMIFaE
JU2H4ex4Q8PNPCrPYNe0puGyAEk86GyujKEeo/Ny0clR1NjQW0D62kCMeeuEIkzHgR2G
l52w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=P6Z0v9r/qlyNNArrrFqmPTYANdsIl1HTy0hj6Bcuw+M=;
b=jKxQUxMeDbWIixul7n8XbO7uWD5CRc6eXSQLe/rjTmyCgvQuPq2iLH4qK3/lKfysgc
eVCnztT6j7YkK5ryQejeG3eZuBC+gcoWeMVmvwHk9FCsgIrR3I061fHJLoaG8iMncjis
tWzVMK3Rph7z7oqcUr6bS96pr5MBBDxAIKRi3R0JucigvNdeQc4c7U2cxGed3QRvU7O/
wtqRi/21c+wP4nT2GWPQ6lvK374+4RsEg1wDReyrlkQRybtY94aB6QS3k265cFMiuV6x
5uzhHkfKiyM4sb9IapaGx9sp5XCJXQKAQVShw/6YySx+evUbgdc78/0sKEUtkm8tVDn7
0BsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1104k2PQJugRjxaBD6SPMRrY3vEI9KGJnJZDBcs1CnTjGg15X3fW
dxCo7upiXm1wqscCb4YVM1BMR2EjcgFuvoA=
X-Received: by 10.37.114.194 with SMTP id n185mr4106952ybc.349.1501022806316;
Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.129.71.3 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1501021831.16994.8.camel@gentoo.org>
References: <1500969906.1206.1.camel@gentoo.org> <d7063459-69ab-e921-e240-2ab7a6fad40f@gentoo.org>
<0A428688-D128-4767-A9E5-E0F2D3004B18@gentoo.org> <5a155985-1ce4-9872-0259-b67520d9a867@gentoo.org>
<1500988986.795.5.camel@gentoo.org> <a1c6ccda-2053-ad6b-baa9-dd351446087b@gentoo.org>
<CAJ0EP43h9tBm+-PrBsv4k=n6RQg0AE_Hdvspjko1OcaCrpE2Tw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGfcS_m1Cu2qypEUGtyfEqUQY6OeCT30BoHFHoy6cSLm-Kj4SA@mail.gmail.com> <1501021831.16994.8.camel@gentoo.org>
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:46:45 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: t8N6VccmQ_z9B3tzedles0JJjIM
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_mpL=wcGgxOjbK8=PAK_LvuFm7KhNxSM-UVkw+cdTdB2A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 80da506a-6520-4d51-82e0-3ed1c54d8f6c
X-Archives-Hash: cf49aa70ddb68969fa588130ccf13db9
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny@gentoo.org>=
wrote:
> On wto, 2017-07-25 at 18:26 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> wrote=
:
>> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> wr=
ote:
>> > > On 07/25/2017 09:23 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > How is that relevant? Revision bumps are merely a tool to encourag=
e
>> > > > 'automatic' rebuilds of packages during @world upgrade. I can't th=
ink of
>> > > > a single use case where somebody would actually think it sane to
>> > > > checkout one commit after another, and run @world upgrade in the m=
iddle
>> > > > of it.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Revisions are to indicate that one incarnation of a package differs =
from
>> > > another in a way that the user or package manager might care about. =
And
>> > > on principal, it's no business of yours what people want to do with
>> > > their tree. If someone wants to check out successive commits and eme=
rge
>> > > @world, he's within his rights to do so.
>> >
>> > I don't feel I should be obligated by policy to support this use case.
>> > One revbump per push seems sufficiently safe for 99.9% of users.
>> >
>> > If you want to do more revbumps, you are free to do so.
>> >
>>
>> What is the point of separating changes by commits if we don't
>> generally try to keep each commit working?
>>
>> Sure, there are some cases where it is just going to be too painful to
>> ensure that, and so it doesn't have to be an absolute rule.
>>
>> However, if somebody is checking out a tree at some point in the past
>> they shouldn't have to try to figure out where the last push boundary
>> was to ensure that it is sane. Use cases for that include updating
>> older systems progressively, or bisecting a problem.
>
> Guys, please cut this FUD.
>
> Nothing is broken if you don't revbump. The only thing that doesn't
> happen is that the PM isn't obliged to suggest user to upgrade.
>
I wasn't referring to revbumps. Just to ensuring that all commits
generally work even if they aren't pushed.
--=20
Rich